[NETFILTER]: nf_conntrack_expect: function naming unification
Currently there is a wild mix of nf_conntrack_expect_, nf_ct_exp_,
expect_, exp_, ...
Consistently use nf_ct_ as prefix for exported functions.
Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_sane.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_sane.c
index eb2d1dc..28ed303 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_sane.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_sane.c
@@ -141,27 +141,25 @@
if (reply->zero != 0)
goto out;
- exp = nf_conntrack_expect_alloc(ct);
+ exp = nf_ct_expect_alloc(ct);
if (exp == NULL) {
ret = NF_DROP;
goto out;
}
tuple = &ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL].tuple;
- nf_conntrack_expect_init(exp, family,
- &tuple->src.u3, &tuple->dst.u3,
- IPPROTO_TCP,
- NULL, &reply->port);
+ nf_ct_expect_init(exp, family, &tuple->src.u3, &tuple->dst.u3,
+ IPPROTO_TCP, NULL, &reply->port);
DEBUGP("nf_ct_sane: expect: ");
NF_CT_DUMP_TUPLE(&exp->tuple);
NF_CT_DUMP_TUPLE(&exp->mask);
/* Can't expect this? Best to drop packet now. */
- if (nf_conntrack_expect_related(exp) != 0)
+ if (nf_ct_expect_related(exp) != 0)
ret = NF_DROP;
- nf_conntrack_expect_put(exp);
+ nf_ct_expect_put(exp);
out:
spin_unlock_bh(&nf_sane_lock);