x86: don't send SIGBUS for kernel page faults
It's wrong for several reasons, but the most direct one is that the
fault may be for the stack accesses to set up a previous SIGBUS. When
we have a kernel exception, the kernel exception handler does all the
fixups, not some user-level signal handler.
Even apart from the nested SIGBUS issue, it's also wrong to give out
kernel fault addresses in the signal handler info block, or to send a
SIGBUS when a system call already returns EFAULT.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
index f627779..4c4508e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
@@ -802,8 +802,10 @@
up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
/* Kernel mode? Handle exceptions or die: */
- if (!(error_code & PF_USER))
+ if (!(error_code & PF_USER)) {
no_context(regs, error_code, address);
+ return;
+ }
/* User-space => ok to do another page fault: */
if (is_prefetch(regs, error_code, address))