sh: use printk_ratelimited instead of printk_ratelimit
Follows the powerpc change, for much the same rationale.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
diff --git a/arch/sh/mm/alignment.c b/arch/sh/mm/alignment.c
index b2595b8..620fa7f 100644
--- a/arch/sh/mm/alignment.c
+++ b/arch/sh/mm/alignment.c
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
#include <linux/seq_file.h>
#include <linux/proc_fs.h>
#include <linux/uaccess.h>
+#include <linux/ratelimit.h>
#include <asm/alignment.h>
#include <asm/processor.h>
@@ -95,13 +96,13 @@
void unaligned_fixups_notify(struct task_struct *tsk, insn_size_t insn,
struct pt_regs *regs)
{
- if (user_mode(regs) && (se_usermode & UM_WARN) && printk_ratelimit())
- pr_notice("Fixing up unaligned userspace access "
+ if (user_mode(regs) && (se_usermode & UM_WARN))
+ pr_notice_ratelimited("Fixing up unaligned userspace access "
"in \"%s\" pid=%d pc=0x%p ins=0x%04hx\n",
tsk->comm, task_pid_nr(tsk),
(void *)instruction_pointer(regs), insn);
- else if (se_kernmode_warn && printk_ratelimit())
- pr_notice("Fixing up unaligned kernel access "
+ else if (se_kernmode_warn)
+ pr_notice_ratelimited("Fixing up unaligned kernel access "
"in \"%s\" pid=%d pc=0x%p ins=0x%04hx\n",
tsk->comm, task_pid_nr(tsk),
(void *)instruction_pointer(regs), insn);