[DCCP]: Move the ack vector code to net/dccp/ackvec.[ch]
Isolating it, that will be used when we introduce a CCID2 (TCP-Like)
implementation.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
diff --git a/net/dccp/input.c b/net/dccp/input.c
index 062e9f8..1b6b2cb 100644
--- a/net/dccp/input.c
+++ b/net/dccp/input.c
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
#include <net/sock.h>
+#include "ackvec.h"
#include "ccid.h"
#include "dccp.h"
@@ -60,8 +61,8 @@
struct dccp_sock *dp = dccp_sk(sk);
if (dp->dccps_options.dccpo_send_ack_vector)
- dccp_ackpkts_check_rcv_ackno(dp->dccps_hc_rx_ackpkts, sk,
- DCCP_SKB_CB(skb)->dccpd_ack_seq);
+ dccp_ackvec_check_rcv_ackno(dp->dccps_hc_rx_ackvec, sk,
+ DCCP_SKB_CB(skb)->dccpd_ack_seq);
}
static int dccp_check_seqno(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
@@ -164,37 +165,11 @@
if (DCCP_SKB_CB(skb)->dccpd_ack_seq != DCCP_PKT_WITHOUT_ACK_SEQ)
dccp_event_ack_recv(sk, skb);
- /*
- * FIXME: check ECN to see if we should use
- * DCCP_ACKPKTS_STATE_ECN_MARKED
- */
- if (dp->dccps_options.dccpo_send_ack_vector) {
- struct dccp_ackpkts *ap = dp->dccps_hc_rx_ackpkts;
-
- if (dccp_ackpkts_add(dp->dccps_hc_rx_ackpkts, sk,
- DCCP_SKB_CB(skb)->dccpd_seq,
- DCCP_ACKPKTS_STATE_RECEIVED)) {
- LIMIT_NETDEBUG(KERN_WARNING "DCCP: acknowledgeable "
- "packets buffer full!\n");
- ap->dccpap_ack_seqno = DCCP_MAX_SEQNO + 1;
- inet_csk_schedule_ack(sk);
- inet_csk_reset_xmit_timer(sk, ICSK_TIME_DACK,
- TCP_DELACK_MIN,
- DCCP_RTO_MAX);
- goto discard;
- }
-
- /*
- * FIXME: this activation is probably wrong, have to study more
- * TCP delack machinery and how it fits into DCCP draft, but
- * for now it kinda "works" 8)
- */
- if (!inet_csk_ack_scheduled(sk)) {
- inet_csk_schedule_ack(sk);
- inet_csk_reset_xmit_timer(sk, ICSK_TIME_DACK, 5 * HZ,
- DCCP_RTO_MAX);
- }
- }
+ if (dp->dccps_options.dccpo_send_ack_vector &&
+ dccp_ackvec_add(dp->dccps_hc_rx_ackvec, sk,
+ DCCP_SKB_CB(skb)->dccpd_seq,
+ DCCP_ACKVEC_STATE_RECEIVED))
+ goto discard;
ccid_hc_rx_packet_recv(dp->dccps_hc_rx_ccid, sk, skb);
ccid_hc_tx_packet_recv(dp->dccps_hc_tx_ccid, sk, skb);
@@ -495,29 +470,11 @@
ccid_hc_rx_packet_recv(dp->dccps_hc_rx_ccid, sk, skb);
ccid_hc_tx_packet_recv(dp->dccps_hc_tx_ccid, sk, skb);
- /*
- * FIXME: check ECN to see if we should use
- * DCCP_ACKPKTS_STATE_ECN_MARKED
- */
- if (dp->dccps_options.dccpo_send_ack_vector) {
- if (dccp_ackpkts_add(dp->dccps_hc_rx_ackpkts, sk,
- dcb->dccpd_seq,
- DCCP_ACKPKTS_STATE_RECEIVED))
- goto discard;
- /*
- * FIXME: this activation is probably wrong, have to
- * study more TCP delack machinery and how it fits into
- * DCCP draft, but for now it kinda "works" 8)
- */
- if ((dp->dccps_hc_rx_ackpkts->dccpap_ack_seqno ==
- DCCP_MAX_SEQNO + 1) &&
- !inet_csk_ack_scheduled(sk)) {
- inet_csk_schedule_ack(sk);
- inet_csk_reset_xmit_timer(sk, ICSK_TIME_DACK,
- TCP_DELACK_MIN,
- DCCP_RTO_MAX);
- }
- }
+ if (dp->dccps_options.dccpo_send_ack_vector &&
+ dccp_ackvec_add(dp->dccps_hc_rx_ackvec, sk,
+ DCCP_SKB_CB(skb)->dccpd_seq,
+ DCCP_ACKVEC_STATE_RECEIVED))
+ goto discard;
}
/*