btrfs: don't BUG_ON btrfs_alloc_path() errors
This patch fixes many callers of btrfs_alloc_path() which BUG_ON allocation
failure. All the sites that are fixed in this patch were checked by me to
be fairly trivial to fix because of at least one of two criteria:
- Callers of the function catch errors from it already so bubbling the
error up will be handled.
- Callers of the function might BUG_ON any nonzero return code in which
case there is no behavior changed (but we still got to remove a BUG_ON)
The following functions were updated:
btrfs_lookup_extent, alloc_reserved_tree_block, btrfs_remove_block_group,
btrfs_lookup_csums_range, btrfs_csum_file_blocks, btrfs_mark_extent_written,
btrfs_inode_by_name, btrfs_new_inode, btrfs_symlink,
insert_reserved_file_extent, and run_delalloc_nocow
Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file-item.c b/fs/btrfs/file-item.c
index 90d4ee5..f92ff0e 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/file-item.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/file-item.c
@@ -282,7 +282,8 @@
u16 csum_size = btrfs_super_csum_size(&root->fs_info->super_copy);
path = btrfs_alloc_path();
- BUG_ON(!path);
+ if (!path)
+ return -ENOMEM;
if (search_commit) {
path->skip_locking = 1;
@@ -672,7 +673,9 @@
btrfs_super_csum_size(&root->fs_info->super_copy);
path = btrfs_alloc_path();
- BUG_ON(!path);
+ if (!path)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
sector_sum = sums->sums;
again:
next_offset = (u64)-1;