[SCSI] zfcp: Add comments to switch/case fallthroughs
Add comments where there is a deliberate fall through in switch/case
statements. This makes some code checkers happy and makes it clear
that there is no missing break statement.
Reviewed-by: Swen Schillig <swen@vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christof Schmitt <christof.schmitt@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
diff --git a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c
index 8411730..b550c24 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c
@@ -526,6 +526,7 @@
break;
case FSF_TOPO_AL:
fc_host_port_type(shost) = FC_PORTTYPE_NLPORT;
+ /* fall through */
default:
dev_err(&adapter->ccw_device->dev,
"Unknown or unsupported arbitrated loop "
@@ -897,6 +898,7 @@
switch (fsq->word[0]) {
case FSF_SQ_INVOKE_LINK_TEST_PROCEDURE:
zfcp_test_link(unit->port);
+ /* fall through */
case FSF_SQ_ULP_DEPENDENT_ERP_REQUIRED:
req->status |= ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_ERROR;
break;
@@ -993,6 +995,7 @@
break;
case FSF_PORT_HANDLE_NOT_VALID:
zfcp_erp_adapter_reopen(adapter, 0, "fsscth1", req);
+ /* fall through */
case FSF_GENERIC_COMMAND_REJECTED:
case FSF_PAYLOAD_SIZE_MISMATCH:
case FSF_REQUEST_SIZE_TOO_LARGE:
@@ -1590,8 +1593,10 @@
case FSF_MAXIMUM_NUMBER_OF_PORTS_EXCEEDED:
dev_warn(&req->adapter->ccw_device->dev,
"Opening WKA port 0x%x failed\n", wka_port->d_id);
+ /* fall through */
case FSF_ADAPTER_STATUS_AVAILABLE:
req->status |= ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_ERROR;
+ /* fall through */
case FSF_ACCESS_DENIED:
wka_port->status = ZFCP_WKA_PORT_OFFLINE;
break;