Nick Piggin | 64c7c8f | 2005-11-08 21:39:04 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | CPU Scheduler implementation hints for architecture specific code |
| 2 | |
| 3 | Nick Piggin, 2005 |
| 4 | |
| 5 | Context switch |
| 6 | ============== |
| 7 | 1. Runqueue locking |
| 8 | By default, the switch_to arch function is called with the runqueue |
| 9 | locked. This is usually not a problem unless switch_to may need to |
| 10 | take the runqueue lock. This is usually due to a wake up operation in |
| 11 | the context switch. See include/asm-ia64/system.h for an example. |
| 12 | |
| 13 | To request the scheduler call switch_to with the runqueue unlocked, |
| 14 | you must `#define __ARCH_WANT_UNLOCKED_CTXSW` in a header file |
| 15 | (typically the one where switch_to is defined). |
| 16 | |
| 17 | Unlocked context switches introduce only a very minor performance |
| 18 | penalty to the core scheduler implementation in the CONFIG_SMP case. |
| 19 | |
| 20 | 2. Interrupt status |
| 21 | By default, the switch_to arch function is called with interrupts |
| 22 | disabled. Interrupts may be enabled over the call if it is likely to |
| 23 | introduce a significant interrupt latency by adding the line |
| 24 | `#define __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW` in the same place as for |
| 25 | unlocked context switches. This define also implies |
| 26 | `__ARCH_WANT_UNLOCKED_CTXSW`. See include/asm-arm/system.h for an |
| 27 | example. |
| 28 | |
| 29 | |
| 30 | CPU idle |
| 31 | ======== |
| 32 | Your cpu_idle routines need to obey the following rules: |
| 33 | |
| 34 | 1. Preempt should now disabled over idle routines. Should only |
| 35 | be enabled to call schedule() then disabled again. |
| 36 | |
| 37 | 2. need_resched/TIF_NEED_RESCHED is only ever set, and will never |
| 38 | be cleared until the running task has called schedule(). Idle |
| 39 | threads need only ever query need_resched, and may never set or |
| 40 | clear it. |
| 41 | |
| 42 | 3. When cpu_idle finds (need_resched() == 'true'), it should call |
| 43 | schedule(). It should not call schedule() otherwise. |
| 44 | |
| 45 | 4. The only time interrupts need to be disabled when checking |
| 46 | need_resched is if we are about to sleep the processor until |
| 47 | the next interrupt (this doesn't provide any protection of |
| 48 | need_resched, it prevents losing an interrupt). |
| 49 | |
| 50 | 4a. Common problem with this type of sleep appears to be: |
| 51 | local_irq_disable(); |
| 52 | if (!need_resched()) { |
| 53 | local_irq_enable(); |
| 54 | *** resched interrupt arrives here *** |
| 55 | __asm__("sleep until next interrupt"); |
| 56 | } |
| 57 | |
| 58 | 5. TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG can be set by idle routines that do not |
| 59 | need an interrupt to wake them up when need_resched goes high. |
| 60 | In other words, they must be periodically polling need_resched, |
| 61 | although it may be reasonable to do some background work or enter |
| 62 | a low CPU priority. |
| 63 | |
| 64 | 5a. If TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG is set, and we do decide to enter |
| 65 | an interrupt sleep, it needs to be cleared then a memory |
| 66 | barrier issued (followed by a test of need_resched with |
| 67 | interrupts disabled, as explained in 3). |
| 68 | |
| 69 | arch/i386/kernel/process.c has examples of both polling and |
| 70 | sleeping idle functions. |
| 71 | |
| 72 | |
| 73 | Possible arch/ problems |
| 74 | ======================= |
| 75 | |
| 76 | Possible arch problems I found (and either tried to fix or didn't): |
| 77 | |
| 78 | h8300 - Is such sleeping racy vs interrupts? (See #4a). |
| 79 | The H8/300 manual I found indicates yes, however disabling IRQs |
| 80 | over the sleep mean only NMIs can wake it up, so can't fix easily |
| 81 | without doing spin waiting. |
| 82 | |
| 83 | ia64 - is safe_halt call racy vs interrupts? (does it sleep?) (See #4a) |
| 84 | |
| 85 | sh64 - Is sleeping racy vs interrupts? (See #4a) |
| 86 | |
| 87 | sparc - IRQs on at this point(?), change local_irq_save to _disable. |
| 88 | - TODO: needs secondary CPUs to disable preempt (See #1) |
| 89 | |