x86_64: Fix GenDalvikArgsRange for 64-bit ref

32-bit virtual register can be in 64-bit solo register.
So we should not compute the size of virtual register
basing on size of phyical register.

Change-Id: I4e11be13df8469be63808d0ce9d1ca6f80bef483
Signed-off-by: Serguei Katkov <serguei.i.katkov@intel.com>
diff --git a/compiler/dex/quick/x86/target_x86.cc b/compiler/dex/quick/x86/target_x86.cc
index bb1f379..cc955a8 100755
--- a/compiler/dex/quick/x86/target_x86.cc
+++ b/compiler/dex/quick/x86/target_x86.cc
@@ -2478,7 +2478,7 @@
   in_to_reg_storage_mapping.Initialize(info->args, info->num_arg_words, &mapper);
   const int last_mapped_in = in_to_reg_storage_mapping.GetMaxMappedIn();
   const int size_of_the_last_mapped = last_mapped_in == -1 ? 1 :
-          in_to_reg_storage_mapping.Get(last_mapped_in).Is64BitSolo() ? 2 : 1;
+          info->args[last_mapped_in].wide ? 2 : 1;
   int regs_left_to_pass_via_stack = info->num_arg_words - (last_mapped_in + size_of_the_last_mapped);
 
   // Fisrt of all, check whether it make sense to use bulk copying
diff --git a/test/700-LoadArgRegs/expected.txt b/test/700-LoadArgRegs/expected.txt
index 4977df6..c0d5eee 100644
--- a/test/700-LoadArgRegs/expected.txt
+++ b/test/700-LoadArgRegs/expected.txt
@@ -74,3 +74,4 @@
 -91, -92, -93, -94, -95, -96, -97, -98, -99
 -1, -91, -92, -93, -94, -95, -96, -97, -98, -99
 1, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 7.0, 8.0, 9.0, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
+1234605616436508552, -8613303245920329199, 1234605616436508552
diff --git a/test/700-LoadArgRegs/src/Main.java b/test/700-LoadArgRegs/src/Main.java
index 0e6de73..4649d05 100644
--- a/test/700-LoadArgRegs/src/Main.java
+++ b/test/700-LoadArgRegs/src/Main.java
@@ -274,6 +274,14 @@
     System.out.println(i1+", "+d1+", "+d2+", "+d3+", "+d4+", "+d5+", "+d6+", "+d7+", "+d8+", "+d9+", "+i2+", "+i3+", "+i4+", "+i5+", "+i6);
   }
 
+  static void testRefs1(Object o1, Object o2, Object o3, Object o4, Object o5, long l1, long l2, long l3) {
+    System.out.println(l1 + ", " + l2 + ", " + l3);
+  }
+
+  static void testRefs(Object o1, Object o2, Object o3, Object o4, Object o5, long l1, long l2, long l3) {
+    testRefs1(o1, o2, o3, o4, o5, l1, l2, l3);
+  }
+
   static public void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
     testI();
     testB();
@@ -288,5 +296,8 @@
     testLL();
 
     testMore(1, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 7.0, 8.0, 9.0, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6);
+
+    Object obj = new Object();
+    testRefs(obj, obj, obj, obj, obj, 0x1122334455667788L, 0x8877665544332211L, 0x1122334455667788L);
   }
 }