Don't be too specific in reference table summaries.

Implying that the examplar Class' specific type was true of all
the classes was misleading; we should just say "Class" in the
summary:

W/dalvikvm(  801): JNI local reference table summary (23 entries):
W/dalvikvm(  801):    20 of java.lang.Class (19 unique instances)
W/dalvikvm(  801):     2 of java.lang.String (2 unique instances)
W/dalvikvm(  801):     1 of java.lang.String[] (2 elements)

Change-Id: Ia961cfc689aa390c84ecbc96e44bdd64448ac051
1 file changed