diff --git a/www/architecture.html b/www/architecture.html
index b7d1f91..393caf1 100644
--- a/www/architecture.html
+++ b/www/architecture.html
@@ -123,7 +123,10 @@
<div class="sponsbox">
<div class="sponsor">
- <a href="http://www.buerodruck.de/stempel-service/index.html">Stempel bestellen</a><!-- 200910000035+ -->
+ <a href="http://www.hygi.de">Reinigungsmittel</a><!-- 201002000400+ -->
+</div>
+<div class="sponsor">
+ <a href="http://www.blumenversender.com">Blumenversand</a><!-- 201005010120 -->
</div>
<div class="sponsor">
<a href="http://www.online-kredit-index.de">Kredit</a><!-- 201003010120 Buchhorn -->
@@ -138,9 +141,6 @@
<a href="http://www.allesdruck.de">Druckerei Online</a><!-- 201012001200 allesdruck.de-->
</div>
<div class="sponsor">
- <a href="http://www.blumenversender.com">Blumenversand</a><!-- 200911010120 -->
-</div>
-<div class="sponsor">
<a href="http://www.who-sells-it.com/">Free Catalogs</a><!-- 201002010000 -->
</div>
</div>
@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@
<p>When the pixel cache is initialized, pixels are scaled from whatever bit depth they originated from to that required by the pixel cache. For example, a 1-channel 1-bit monochrome PBM image is scaled to a 4 channel 8-bit RGBA image, if you are using the Q8 version of ImageMagick, and 16-bit RGBA for the Q16 version. You can determine which version you have using the <a href="../www/command-line-options.html#version">‑version</a> option, as with this command: </p>
-<p class='crt'><span class="crtprompt"> $magick> </span><span class='crtin'>identify -version</span><span class='crtout'>Version: ImageMagick 6.5.7-5 2009-11-01 Q16 http://www.imagemagick.org</span></p>
+<p class='crt'><span class="crtprompt"> $magick> </span><span class='crtin'>identify -version</span><span class='crtout'>Version: ImageMagick 6.5.7-6 2009-11-01 Q16 http://www.imagemagick.org</span></p>
<p>As you can see, the convenience of the pixel cache sometimes comes with a trade-off in storage (e.g. storing a 1-bit monochrome image as 16-bit RGBA is wasteful) and speed (i.e. storing the entire image in memory is generally slower than accessing one scanline of pixels at a time).</p>
</div>
@@ -1220,7 +1220,7 @@
<span id="linkbar-center">
<a href="http://www.imagemagick.org/discourse-server/">Discourse Server</a> •
<a href="../www/mailing-list.html">Mailing Lists</a> •
- <a href="http://www.imagemagick.org/MagickStudio/scripts/MagickStudio.cgi">Studio</a>
+ <a href="http://studio.webbyland.com/ImageMagick/MagickStudio/scripts/MagickStudio.cgi">Studio</a>
</span>
<span id="linkbar-east"> </span>
</div>