diff --git a/www/architecture.html b/www/architecture.html
index 7cd296c..184c6df 100644
--- a/www/architecture.html
+++ b/www/architecture.html
@@ -123,6 +123,12 @@
 
 <div class="sponsbox">
 <div  class="sponsor">
+   <a href="http://www.buerodruck.de/stempel-service/index.html">Stempel bestellen</a><!-- 200910000035+ -->
+</div>
+<div  class="sponsor">
+  <a href="http://www.print24.de/">Druckerei</a><!-- 201009010720 -->
+</div>
+<div  class="sponsor">
    <a href="http://www.goyax.de">Börse</a><!-- 201001000240 Gewiese digital-finance.de -->
 </div>
 <div  class="sponsor">
@@ -132,9 +138,6 @@
   <a href="http://www.blumenversender.com">Blumenversand</a><!-- 200911010120 -->
 </div>
 <div  class="sponsor">
-  <a href="http://www.print24.de/">Druckerei</a><!-- 200911010480 -->
-</div>
-<div  class="sponsor">
   <a href="http://www.who-sells-it.com/">Free Catalogs</a><!-- 201002010000 -->
 </div>
 <div  class="sponsor">
@@ -234,7 +237,7 @@
 
 <p>When the pixel cache is initialized, pixels are scaled from whatever bit depth they originated from to that required by the pixel cache.  For example, a 1-channel 1-bit monochrome PBM image is scaled to a 4 channel 8-bit RGBA image, if you are using the Q8 version of ImageMagick, and 16-bit RGBA for the Q16 version.  You can determine which version you have using the <a href="../www/command-line-options.html#version">&#x2011;version</a> option, as with this command: </p>
 
-<p class='crt'><span class="crtprompt"> $magick&gt; </span><span class='crtin'>identify -version</span><span class='crtout'>Version: ImageMagick 6.5.6-4 2009-09-45 Q16 http://www.imagemagick.org</span></p>
+<p class='crt'><span class="crtprompt"> $magick&gt; </span><span class='crtin'>identify -version</span><span class='crtout'>Version: ImageMagick 6.5.6-5 2009-09-55 Q16 http://www.imagemagick.org</span></p>
 <p>As you can see, the convenience of the pixel cache sometimes comes with a trade-off in storage (e.g. storing a 1-bit monochrome image as 16-bit RGBA is wasteful) and speed (i.e. storing the entire image in memory is generally slower than accessing one scanline of pixels at a time).</p>
 </div>