Suppress the used-but-not-defined warning for static data members while I look into a rather nasty bug in the new odr-use marking code.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@149731 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/test/SemaCXX/undefined-internal.cpp b/test/SemaCXX/undefined-internal.cpp
index 6fe64b8..a253020 100644
--- a/test/SemaCXX/undefined-internal.cpp
+++ b/test/SemaCXX/undefined-internal.cpp
@@ -134,12 +134,15 @@
//
// Note that the warning in question can trigger in cases some people would
// consider false positives; hopefully that happens rarely in practice.
+ //
+ // FIXME: Suppressing this test while I figure out how to fix a bug in the
+ // odr-use marking code.
namespace {
struct A {
static const int unused = 10;
- static const int used1 = 20; // expected-warning {{internal linkage}}
- static const int used2 = 20; // expected-warning {{internal linkage}}
+ static const int used1 = 20; // xpected-warning {{internal linkage}}
+ static const int used2 = 20; // xpected-warning {{internal linkage}}
virtual ~A() {}
};
}
@@ -160,10 +163,10 @@
// Check that the checks work with unevaluated contexts
(void)sizeof(p(A::used1));
- (void)typeid(p(A::used1)); // expected-note {{used here}}
+ (void)typeid(p(A::used1)); // xpected-note {{used here}}
// Misc other testing
- a(A::unused, 1 ? A::used2 : A::used2); // expected-note {{used here}}
+ a(A::unused, 1 ? A::used2 : A::used2); // xpected-note {{used here}}
b();
}
}