Fixed: <rdar://problem/5881148>
Problem:
In the recently refactored VisitDeref (which processes dereferences), we
were incorrectly skipping the node just generated for the subexpression
of the dereference. This was a horrible regression.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@50176 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/lib/Analysis/CFRefCount.cpp b/lib/Analysis/CFRefCount.cpp
index 499da2f..4b23ff4 100644
--- a/lib/Analysis/CFRefCount.cpp
+++ b/lib/Analysis/CFRefCount.cpp
@@ -659,7 +659,7 @@
virtual void EvalCall(ExplodedNodeSet<ValueState>& Dst,
GRExprEngine& Eng,
GRStmtNodeBuilder<ValueState>& Builder,
- CallExpr* CE, LVal L,
+ CallExpr* CE, RVal L,
ExplodedNode<ValueState>* Pred);
virtual void EvalObjCMessageExpr(ExplodedNodeSet<ValueState>& Dst,
@@ -769,7 +769,7 @@
void CFRefCount::EvalCall(ExplodedNodeSet<ValueState>& Dst,
GRExprEngine& Eng,
GRStmtNodeBuilder<ValueState>& Builder,
- CallExpr* CE, LVal L,
+ CallExpr* CE, RVal L,
ExplodedNode<ValueState>* Pred) {
ValueStateManager& StateMgr = Eng.getStateManager();