Standard conversion sequences now have a CopyConstructor field, to
cope with the case where a user-defined conversion is actually a copy
construction, and therefore can be compared against other standard
conversion sequences. While I called this a hack before, now I'm
convinced that it's the right way to go.
Compare overloads based on derived-to-base conversions that invoke
copy constructors.
Suppress user-defined conversions when attempting to call a
user-defined conversion.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@58629 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/test/SemaCXX/overload-call-copycon.cpp b/test/SemaCXX/overload-call-copycon.cpp
index 8270928..281f4ce 100644
--- a/test/SemaCXX/overload-call-copycon.cpp
+++ b/test/SemaCXX/overload-call-copycon.cpp
@@ -36,3 +36,13 @@
int& i1 = copycon3(b);
float& f1 = copycon3(bc);
}
+
+
+class C : public B { };
+
+float& copycon4(A a);
+int& copycon4(B b);
+
+void test_copycon4(C c) {
+ int& i = copycon4(c);
+};