When finalizing a function template specialization following template
argument deduction, make sure to check the correctness of deduced template
type arguments (which we had previously skipped) along with other
kinds of template arguments. This fixes part of PR6784, but we're
still swallowing the extension warning about unnamed/local template
arguments.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@116327 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateDeduction.cpp b/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateDeduction.cpp
index f3ffa71..6237610 100644
--- a/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateDeduction.cpp
+++ b/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateDeduction.cpp
@@ -1018,7 +1018,7 @@
for (unsigned I = 0, N = Deduced.size(); I != N; ++I) {
if (Deduced[I].isNull()) {
Decl *Param
- = const_cast<NamedDecl *>(
+ = const_cast<NamedDecl *>(
Partial->getTemplateParameters()->getParam(I));
Info.Param = makeTemplateParameter(Param);
return Sema::TDK_Incomplete;
@@ -1383,13 +1383,10 @@
for (unsigned I = 0, N = Deduced.size(); I != N; ++I) {
NamedDecl *Param = FunctionTemplate->getTemplateParameters()->getParam(I);
if (!Deduced[I].isNull()) {
- if (I < NumExplicitlySpecified ||
- Deduced[I].getKind() == TemplateArgument::Type) {
+ if (I < NumExplicitlySpecified) {
// We have already fully type-checked and converted this
- // argument (because it was explicitly-specified) or no
- // additional checking is necessary (because it's a template
- // type parameter). Just record the presence of this
- // parameter.
+ // argument, because it was explicitly-specified. Just record the
+ // presence of this argument.
Builder.Append(Deduced[I]);
continue;
}