First pass at collecting access-specifier information along inheritance paths.
Triggers lots of assertions about missing access information; fix them.
Will actually consume this information soon.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@94038 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/lib/AST/CXXInheritance.cpp b/lib/AST/CXXInheritance.cpp
index 92a58b7..d575ccd 100644
--- a/lib/AST/CXXInheritance.cpp
+++ b/lib/AST/CXXInheritance.cpp
@@ -61,6 +61,7 @@
Paths.clear();
ClassSubobjects.clear();
ScratchPath.clear();
+ ScratchAccess.clear();
DetectedVirtual = 0;
}
@@ -145,7 +146,7 @@
void *UserData,
CXXBasePaths &Paths) const {
bool FoundPath = false;
-
+
ASTContext &Context = getASTContext();
for (base_class_const_iterator BaseSpec = bases_begin(),
BaseSpecEnd = bases_end(); BaseSpec != BaseSpecEnd; ++BaseSpec) {
@@ -189,6 +190,17 @@
else
Element.SubobjectNumber = Subobjects.second;
Paths.ScratchPath.push_back(Element);
+
+ // C++0x [class.access.base]p1 (paraphrased):
+ // The access of a member of a base class is the less permissive
+ // of its access within the base class and the access of the base
+ // class within the derived class.
+ // We're just calculating the access along the path, so we ignore
+ // the access specifiers of whatever decls we've found.
+ AccessSpecifier PathAccess = Paths.ScratchPath.Access;
+ Paths.ScratchAccess.push_back(PathAccess);
+ Paths.ScratchPath.Access
+ = std::max(PathAccess, BaseSpec->getAccessSpecifier());
}
if (BaseMatches(BaseSpec, Paths.ScratchPath, UserData)) {
@@ -223,8 +235,12 @@
// Pop this base specifier off the current path (if we're
// collecting paths).
- if (Paths.isRecordingPaths())
+ if (Paths.isRecordingPaths()) {
Paths.ScratchPath.pop_back();
+ Paths.ScratchPath.Access = Paths.ScratchAccess.back();
+ Paths.ScratchAccess.pop_back();
+ }
+
// If we set a virtual earlier, and this isn't a path, forget it again.
if (SetVirtual && !FoundPath) {
Paths.DetectedVirtual = 0;