Fix our semantic analysis of
unqualified-id '('
in C++. The unqualified-id might not refer to any declaration in our
current scope, but declarations by that name might be found via
argument-dependent lookup. We now do so properly.
As part of this change, CXXDependentNameExpr, which was previously
designed to express the unqualified-id in the above constructor within
templates, has become UnresolvedFunctionNameExpr, which does
effectively the same thing but will work for both templates and
non-templates.
Additionally, we cope with all unqualified-ids, since ADL also applies
in cases like
operator+(x, y)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@63733 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/lib/AST/ExprCXX.cpp b/lib/AST/ExprCXX.cpp
index b21b413..dbc811a 100644
--- a/lib/AST/ExprCXX.cpp
+++ b/lib/AST/ExprCXX.cpp
@@ -120,11 +120,11 @@
Stmt::child_iterator CXXDeleteExpr::child_begin() { return &Argument; }
Stmt::child_iterator CXXDeleteExpr::child_end() { return &Argument+1; }
-// CXXDependentNameExpr
-Stmt::child_iterator CXXDependentNameExpr::child_begin() {
+// UnresolvedFunctionNameExpr
+Stmt::child_iterator UnresolvedFunctionNameExpr::child_begin() {
return child_iterator();
}
-Stmt::child_iterator CXXDependentNameExpr::child_end() {
+Stmt::child_iterator UnresolvedFunctionNameExpr::child_end() {
return child_iterator();
}