Extend DependentNameType with a keyword enum that specifies whether
this was parsed as a typename-specifier, elaborated-type-specifier
(including the kind), or just a dependent qualified type name.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@100039 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/Mangle.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/Mangle.cpp
index af5e5d3..077db7c 100644
--- a/lib/CodeGen/Mangle.cpp
+++ b/lib/CodeGen/Mangle.cpp
@@ -1456,8 +1456,9 @@
// It isn't clear that we ever actually want to have such a
// nested-name-specifier; why not just represent it as a typename type?
if (!QTy && NNS->getAsIdentifier() && NNS->getPrefix()) {
- QTy = getASTContext().getDependentNameType(NNS->getPrefix(),
- NNS->getAsIdentifier())
+ QTy = getASTContext().getDependentNameType(ETK_Typename,
+ NNS->getPrefix(),
+ NNS->getAsIdentifier())
.getTypePtr();
}
assert(QTy && "Qualifier was not type!");