Fix a problem with false diagnostics when comparing distinct NULL pointer types, from David Majnemer
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@74850 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp b/lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp
index a5e5083..d6e07bb 100644
--- a/lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp
+++ b/lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp
@@ -4110,17 +4110,23 @@
QualType RCanPointeeTy =
Context.getCanonicalType(rType->getAsPointerType()->getPointeeType());
- if (rType->isFunctionPointerType() || lType->isFunctionPointerType()) {
- if (isRelational) {
+ if (isRelational) {
+ if (lType->isFunctionPointerType() || rType->isFunctionPointerType()) {
Diag(Loc, diag::ext_typecheck_ordered_comparison_of_function_pointers)
<< lType << rType << lex->getSourceRange() << rex->getSourceRange();
}
+ if (LCanPointeeTy->isVoidType() != RCanPointeeTy->isVoidType()) {
+ Diag(Loc, diag::ext_typecheck_comparison_of_distinct_pointers)
+ << lType << rType << lex->getSourceRange() << rex->getSourceRange();
+ }
+ } else {
+ if (lType->isFunctionPointerType() != rType->isFunctionPointerType()) {
+ if (!LHSIsNull && !RHSIsNull)
+ Diag(Loc, diag::ext_typecheck_comparison_of_distinct_pointers)
+ << lType << rType << lex->getSourceRange() << rex->getSourceRange();
+ }
}
- if (((!LHSIsNull || isRelational) && LCanPointeeTy->isVoidType()) !=
- ((!RHSIsNull || isRelational) && RCanPointeeTy->isVoidType())) {
- Diag(Loc, diag::ext_typecheck_comparison_of_distinct_pointers)
- << lType << rType << lex->getSourceRange() << rex->getSourceRange();
- }
+
// Simple check: if the pointee types are identical, we're done.
if (LCanPointeeTy == RCanPointeeTy)
return ResultTy;
diff --git a/test/Sema/compare.c b/test/Sema/compare.c
index 51f7731..b7c5c25 100644
--- a/test/Sema/compare.c
+++ b/test/Sema/compare.c
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
// RUN: clang-cc -fsyntax-only -pedantic -verify %s
+#include <stddef.h>
+
int test(char *C) { // nothing here should warn.
return C != ((void*)0);
return C != (void*)0;
@@ -29,3 +31,8 @@
return a == (void *) 0;
return a == (void *) 1; // expected-warning {{comparison of distinct pointer types}}
}
+
+int void_pointers(void *foo)
+{
+ return foo == NULL;
+}