Introduce the notion of instantiation dependence into Clang's AST. A
type/expression/template argument/etc. is instantiation-dependent if
it somehow involves a template parameter, even if it doesn't meet the
requirements for the more common kinds of dependence (dependent type,
type-dependent expression, value-dependent expression).
When we see an instantiation-dependent type, we know we always need to
perform substitution into that instantiation-dependent type. This
keeps us from short-circuiting evaluation in places where we
shouldn't, and lets us properly implement C++0x [temp.type]p2.
In theory, this would also allow us to properly mangle
instantiation-dependent-but-not-dependent decltype types per the
Itanium C++ ABI, but we aren't quite there because we still mangle
based on the canonical type in cases like, e.g.,
template<unsigned> struct A { };
template<typename T>
void f(A<sizeof(sizeof(decltype(T() + T())))>) { }
template void f<int>(A<sizeof(sizeof(int))>);
and therefore get the wrong answer.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@134225 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/lib/Serialization/ASTWriterStmt.cpp b/lib/Serialization/ASTWriterStmt.cpp
index b66fdfa..91c0b3d 100644
--- a/lib/Serialization/ASTWriterStmt.cpp
+++ b/lib/Serialization/ASTWriterStmt.cpp
@@ -375,6 +375,7 @@
Writer.AddTypeRef(E->getType(), Record);
Record.push_back(E->isTypeDependent());
Record.push_back(E->isValueDependent());
+ Record.push_back(E->isInstantiationDependent());
Record.push_back(E->containsUnexpandedParameterPack());
Record.push_back(E->getValueKind());
Record.push_back(E->getObjectKind());