Thread safety analysis: turn on checking within lock and unlock functions.
These checks are enabled with the -Wthread-safety-beta flag.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@179046 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/lib/Analysis/ThreadSafety.cpp b/lib/Analysis/ThreadSafety.cpp
index 4fe342d..479d9a3 100644
--- a/lib/Analysis/ThreadSafety.cpp
+++ b/lib/Analysis/ThreadSafety.cpp
@@ -2279,6 +2279,10 @@
// Fill in source locations for all CFGBlocks.
findBlockLocations(CFGraph, SortedGraph, BlockInfo);
+ MutexIDList ExclusiveLocksAcquired;
+ MutexIDList SharedLocksAcquired;
+ MutexIDList LocksReleased;
+
// Add locks from exclusive_locks_required and shared_locks_required
// to initial lockset. Also turn off checking for lock and unlock functions.
// FIXME: is there a more intelligent way to check lock/unlock functions?
@@ -2300,15 +2304,30 @@
} else if (SharedLocksRequiredAttr *A
= dyn_cast<SharedLocksRequiredAttr>(Attr)) {
getMutexIDs(SharedLocksToAdd, A, (Expr*) 0, D);
- } else if (isa<UnlockFunctionAttr>(Attr)) {
- // Don't try to check unlock functions for now
- return;
- } else if (isa<ExclusiveLockFunctionAttr>(Attr)) {
- // Don't try to check lock functions for now
- return;
- } else if (isa<SharedLockFunctionAttr>(Attr)) {
- // Don't try to check lock functions for now
- return;
+ } else if (UnlockFunctionAttr *A = dyn_cast<UnlockFunctionAttr>(Attr)) {
+ if (!Handler.issueBetaWarnings())
+ return;
+ // UNLOCK_FUNCTION() is used to hide the underlying lock implementation.
+ // We must ignore such methods.
+ if (A->args_size() == 0)
+ return;
+ // FIXME -- deal with exclusive vs. shared unlock functions?
+ getMutexIDs(ExclusiveLocksToAdd, A, (Expr*) 0, D);
+ getMutexIDs(LocksReleased, A, (Expr*) 0, D);
+ } else if (ExclusiveLockFunctionAttr *A
+ = dyn_cast<ExclusiveLockFunctionAttr>(Attr)) {
+ if (!Handler.issueBetaWarnings())
+ return;
+ if (A->args_size() == 0)
+ return;
+ getMutexIDs(ExclusiveLocksAcquired, A, (Expr*) 0, D);
+ } else if (SharedLockFunctionAttr *A
+ = dyn_cast<SharedLockFunctionAttr>(Attr)) {
+ if (!Handler.issueBetaWarnings())
+ return;
+ if (A->args_size() == 0)
+ return;
+ getMutexIDs(SharedLocksAcquired, A, (Expr*) 0, D);
} else if (isa<ExclusiveTrylockFunctionAttr>(Attr)) {
// Don't try to check trylock functions for now
return;
@@ -2491,8 +2510,27 @@
if (!Final->Reachable)
return;
+ // By default, we expect all locks held on entry to be held on exit.
+ FactSet ExpectedExitSet = Initial->EntrySet;
+
+ // Adjust the expected exit set by adding or removing locks, as declared
+ // by *-LOCK_FUNCTION and UNLOCK_FUNCTION. The intersect below will then
+ // issue the appropriate warning.
+ // FIXME: the location here is not quite right.
+ for (unsigned i=0,n=ExclusiveLocksAcquired.size(); i<n; ++i) {
+ ExpectedExitSet.addLock(FactMan, ExclusiveLocksAcquired[i],
+ LockData(D->getLocation(), LK_Exclusive));
+ }
+ for (unsigned i=0,n=SharedLocksAcquired.size(); i<n; ++i) {
+ ExpectedExitSet.addLock(FactMan, SharedLocksAcquired[i],
+ LockData(D->getLocation(), LK_Shared));
+ }
+ for (unsigned i=0,n=LocksReleased.size(); i<n; ++i) {
+ ExpectedExitSet.removeLock(FactMan, LocksReleased[i]);
+ }
+
// FIXME: Should we call this function for all blocks which exit the function?
- intersectAndWarn(Initial->EntrySet, Final->ExitSet,
+ intersectAndWarn(ExpectedExitSet, Final->ExitSet,
Final->ExitLoc,
LEK_LockedAtEndOfFunction,
LEK_NotLockedAtEndOfFunction,