Introduce a centralized routine in Sema for diagnosing failed lookups (when
used as expressions).  In dependent contexts, try to recover by doing a lookup
in previously-dependent base classes.  We get better diagnostics out, but    
unfortunately the recovery fails:  we need to turn it into a method call  
expression, not a bare call expression.  Thus this is still a WIP.




git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@91525 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/lib/Sema/Sema.h b/lib/Sema/Sema.h
index 28a6bba..f189790 100644
--- a/lib/Sema/Sema.h
+++ b/lib/Sema/Sema.h
@@ -1479,6 +1479,8 @@
                                              bool HasTrailingLParen,
                                              bool IsAddressOfOperand);
 
+  bool DiagnoseEmptyLookup(const CXXScopeSpec &SS, LookupResult &R);
+
   OwningExprResult LookupInObjCMethod(LookupResult &R,
                                       Scope *S,
                                       IdentifierInfo *II);
diff --git a/lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp b/lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp
index 77c2636..ac3703e 100644
--- a/lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp
+++ b/lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp
@@ -917,6 +917,68 @@
   SemaRef.Diag(Loc, diag::err_member_call_without_object) << Range;
 }
 
+/// Diagnose an empty lookup.
+///
+/// \return false if new lookup candidates were found
+bool Sema::DiagnoseEmptyLookup(const CXXScopeSpec &SS,
+                               LookupResult &R) {
+  DeclarationName Name = R.getLookupName();
+
+  // We don't know how to recover from bad qualified lookups.
+  if (!SS.isEmpty()) {
+    Diag(R.getNameLoc(), diag::err_no_member)
+      << Name << computeDeclContext(SS, false)
+      << SS.getRange();
+    return true;
+  }
+
+  unsigned diagnostic = diag::err_undeclared_var_use;
+  if (Name.getNameKind() == DeclarationName::CXXOperatorName ||
+      Name.getNameKind() == DeclarationName::CXXLiteralOperatorName ||
+      Name.getNameKind() == DeclarationName::CXXConversionFunctionName)
+    diagnostic = diag::err_undeclared_use;
+
+  // Fake an unqualified lookup.  This is useful when (for example)
+  // the original lookup would not have found something because it was
+  // a dependent name.
+  for (DeclContext *DC = CurContext; DC; DC = DC->getParent()) {
+    if (isa<CXXRecordDecl>(DC)) {
+      LookupQualifiedName(R, DC);
+
+      if (!R.empty()) {
+        // Don't give errors about ambiguities in this lookup.
+        R.suppressDiagnostics();
+
+        CXXMethodDecl *CurMethod = dyn_cast<CXXMethodDecl>(CurContext);
+        bool isInstance = CurMethod &&
+                          CurMethod->isInstance() &&
+                          DC == CurMethod->getParent();
+
+        // Give a code modification hint to insert 'this->'.
+        // TODO: fixit for inserting 'Base<T>::' in the other cases.
+        // Actually quite difficult!
+        if (isInstance)
+          Diag(R.getNameLoc(), diagnostic) << Name
+            << CodeModificationHint::CreateInsertion(R.getNameLoc(),
+                                                     "this->");
+        else
+          Diag(R.getNameLoc(), diagnostic) << Name;
+
+        // Do we really want to note all of these?
+        for (LookupResult::iterator I = R.begin(), E = R.end(); I != E; ++I)
+          Diag((*I)->getLocation(), diag::note_dependent_var_use);
+
+        // Tell the callee to try to recover.
+        return false;
+      }
+    }
+  }
+
+  // Give up, we can't recover.
+  Diag(R.getNameLoc(), diagnostic) << Name;
+  return true;
+}
+
 Sema::OwningExprResult Sema::ActOnIdExpression(Scope *S,
                                                const CXXScopeSpec &SS,
                                                UnqualifiedId &Id,
@@ -989,17 +1051,11 @@
     // If this name wasn't predeclared and if this is not a function
     // call, diagnose the problem.
     if (R.empty()) {
-      if (!SS.isEmpty())
-        return ExprError(Diag(NameLoc, diag::err_no_member)
-                           << Name << computeDeclContext(SS, false)
-                           << SS.getRange());
-      else if (Name.getNameKind() == DeclarationName::CXXOperatorName ||
-               Name.getNameKind() == DeclarationName::CXXLiteralOperatorName ||
-               Name.getNameKind() == DeclarationName::CXXConversionFunctionName)
-        return ExprError(Diag(NameLoc, diag::err_undeclared_use)
-                           << Name);
-      else
-        return ExprError(Diag(NameLoc, diag::err_undeclared_var_use) << Name);
+      if (DiagnoseEmptyLookup(SS, R))
+        return ExprError();
+
+      assert(!R.empty() &&
+             "DiagnoseEmptyLookup returned false but added no results");
     }
   }
 
diff --git a/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp b/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp
index 23598bf..d01bca7 100644
--- a/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp
+++ b/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp
@@ -2622,7 +2622,14 @@
                                   Args, NumArgs, Specialization, Info)) {
     // FIXME: Record what happened with template argument deduction, so
     // that we can give the user a beautiful diagnostic.
-    (void)Result;
+    (void) Result;
+
+    CandidateSet.push_back(OverloadCandidate());
+    OverloadCandidate &Candidate = CandidateSet.back();
+    Candidate.Function = FunctionTemplate->getTemplatedDecl();
+    Candidate.Viable = false;
+    Candidate.IsSurrogate = false;
+    Candidate.IgnoreObjectArgument = false;
     return;
   }
 
@@ -4637,6 +4644,34 @@
                                          CandidateSet,
                                          PartialOverloading);  
 }
+
+/// Attempts to recover from a call where no functions were found.
+///
+/// Returns true if new candidates were found.
+static bool AddRecoveryCallCandidates(Sema &SemaRef, Expr *Fn,
+                         const TemplateArgumentListInfo *ExplicitTemplateArgs,
+                                      Expr **Args, unsigned NumArgs,
+                                      OverloadCandidateSet &CandidateSet) {
+  UnresolvedLookupExpr *ULE
+    = cast<UnresolvedLookupExpr>(Fn->IgnoreParenCasts());
+
+  CXXScopeSpec SS;
+  if (ULE->getQualifier()) {
+    SS.setScopeRep(ULE->getQualifier());
+    SS.setRange(ULE->getQualifierRange());
+  }
+
+  LookupResult R(SemaRef, ULE->getName(), ULE->getNameLoc(),
+                 Sema::LookupOrdinaryName);
+  if (SemaRef.DiagnoseEmptyLookup(SS, R))
+    return false;
+
+  for (LookupResult::iterator I = R.begin(), E = R.end(); I != E; ++I) {
+    AddOverloadedCallCandidate(SemaRef, *I, ExplicitTemplateArgs,
+                               Args, NumArgs, CandidateSet, false);
+  }
+  return true;
+}
   
 /// ResolveOverloadedCallFn - Given the call expression that calls Fn
 /// (which eventually refers to the declaration Func) and the call
@@ -4661,6 +4696,19 @@
   AddOverloadedCallCandidates(Fns, UnqualifiedName, ArgumentDependentLookup,
                               ExplicitTemplateArgs, Args, NumArgs, 
                               CandidateSet);
+
+  // If we found nothing, try to recover.
+  // AddRecoveryCallCandidates diagnoses the error itself, so we just
+  // bailout out if it fails.
+  if (CandidateSet.empty() &&
+      !AddRecoveryCallCandidates(*this, Fn, ExplicitTemplateArgs,
+                                 Args, NumArgs, CandidateSet)) {
+    Fn->Destroy(Context);
+    for (unsigned Arg = 0; Arg < NumArgs; ++Arg)
+      Args[Arg]->Destroy(Context);
+    return 0;
+  }
+
   OverloadCandidateSet::iterator Best;
   switch (BestViableFunction(CandidateSet, Fn->getLocStart(), Best)) {
   case OR_Success: