When we know that we are parsing a class-name, implicitly construct a
TypenameType if getTypeName is looking at a member of an unknown
specialization. This allows us to properly parse class templates that
derived from type that could only otherwise be described by a typename type,
e.g.,
template<class T> struct X {};
template<typename T> struct Y : public X<T>::X { };
Fixes PR4381.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@80123 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp b/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp
index fec9a07..c0e4921 100644
--- a/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp
+++ b/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp
@@ -60,7 +60,8 @@
/// If name lookup results in an ambiguity, this routine will complain
/// and then return NULL.
Sema::TypeTy *Sema::getTypeName(IdentifierInfo &II, SourceLocation NameLoc,
- Scope *S, const CXXScopeSpec *SS) {
+ Scope *S, const CXXScopeSpec *SS,
+ bool isClassName) {
// C++ [temp.res]p3:
// A qualified-id that refers to a type and in which the
// nested-name-specifier depends on a template-parameter (14.6.2)
@@ -70,8 +71,17 @@
//
// We therefore do not perform any name lookup if the result would
// refer to a member of an unknown specialization.
- if (SS && isUnknownSpecialization(*SS))
- return 0;
+ if (SS && isUnknownSpecialization(*SS)) {
+ if (!isClassName)
+ return 0;
+
+ // We know from the grammar that this name refers to a type, so build a
+ // TypenameType node to describe the type.
+ // FIXME: Record somewhere that this TypenameType node has no "typename"
+ // keyword associated with it.
+ return CheckTypenameType((NestedNameSpecifier *)SS->getScopeRep(),
+ II, SS->getRange()).getAsOpaquePtr();
+ }
LookupResult Result
= LookupParsedName(S, SS, &II, LookupOrdinaryName, false, false);