Add basic, hackish support for instantiation of typedefs in a class
template. More importantly, start to sort out the issues regarding
complete types and nested-name-specifiers, especially the question of:
when do we instantiate a class template specialization that occurs to
the left of a '::' in a nested-name-specifier?
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@66662 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/test/SemaCXX/nested-name-spec.cpp b/test/SemaCXX/nested-name-spec.cpp
index 2b6de33..f75b279 100644
--- a/test/SemaCXX/nested-name-spec.cpp
+++ b/test/SemaCXX/nested-name-spec.cpp
@@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
-// RUN: clang -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++98 %s
-// fails due to exact diagnostic matching
+// RUN: clang -fsyntax-only -std=c++98 -verify %s
namespace A {
struct C {
static int cx;
@@ -151,5 +150,10 @@
void N::f() { } // okay
+struct Y; // expected-note{{forward declaration of 'struct Y'}}
+Y::foo y; // expected-error{{incomplete type 'struct Y' named in nested name specifier}} \
+ // FIXME: ugly: expected-error{{invalid token after top level declarator}}
+
X::X() : a(5) { } // expected-error{{use of undeclared identifier 'X'}} \
// expected-error{{expected function body after function declarator}}
+