Implement property '.' notation on Factory/Class objects. Parser changes aren't very pretty:-(
This fixes <rdar://problem/6496506> Implement class setter/getter for properties.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@66465 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/lib/Parse/ParseExpr.cpp b/lib/Parse/ParseExpr.cpp
index 331f318..000cb9d 100644
--- a/lib/Parse/ParseExpr.cpp
+++ b/lib/Parse/ParseExpr.cpp
@@ -569,6 +569,28 @@
return ParseCastExpression(isUnaryExpression, isAddressOfOperand);
}
+ // Support 'Class.property' notation.
+ // We don't use isTokObjCMessageIdentifierReceiver(), since it allows
+ // 'super' (which is inappropriate here).
+ if (getLang().ObjC1 &&
+ Actions.getTypeName(*Tok.getIdentifierInfo(),
+ Tok.getLocation(), CurScope) &&
+ NextToken().is(tok::period)) {
+ IdentifierInfo &ReceiverName = *Tok.getIdentifierInfo();
+ SourceLocation IdentLoc = ConsumeToken();
+ SourceLocation DotLoc = ConsumeToken();
+
+ if (Tok.isNot(tok::identifier)) {
+ Diag(Tok, diag::err_expected_ident);
+ return ExprError();
+ }
+ IdentifierInfo &PropertyName = *Tok.getIdentifierInfo();
+ SourceLocation PropertyLoc = ConsumeToken();
+
+ Res = Actions.ActOnClassPropertyRefExpr(ReceiverName, PropertyName,
+ IdentLoc, PropertyLoc);
+ return move(Res);
+ }
// Consume the identifier so that we can see if it is followed by a '('.
// Function designators are allowed to be undeclared (C99 6.5.1p2), so we
// need to know whether or not this identifier is a function designator or