Fix a pretty bad bug where if a constructor (or conversion function) was marked as 'explicit', but then defined out-of-line, we would not treat it as being explicit.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@94366 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/test/SemaCXX/explicit.cpp b/test/SemaCXX/explicit.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..717ed1e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/SemaCXX/explicit.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++0x %s
+namespace Constructor {
+struct A {
+ A(int);
+};
+
+struct B {
+ explicit B(int);
+};
+
+B::B(int) { }
+
+struct C {
+ void f(const A&);
+ void f(const B&);
+};
+
+void f(C c) {
+ c.f(10);
+}
+}
+
+namespace Conversion {
+ struct A {
+ operator int();
+ explicit operator bool();
+ };
+
+ A::operator bool() { return false; }
+
+ struct B {
+ void f(int);
+ void f(bool);
+ };
+
+ void f(A a, B b) {
+ b.f(a);
+ }
+}