Access control polish: drop the note on the original declaration and
say 'implicitly' when it was implicit. Resolves PR 7930 and my peace of mind.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@116916 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/test/CXX/class.access/p4.cpp b/test/CXX/class.access/p4.cpp
index 92b41b0..565fcef 100644
--- a/test/CXX/class.access/p4.cpp
+++ b/test/CXX/class.access/p4.cpp
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@
// Implicit copy assignment operator uses.
namespace test5 {
class A {
- void operator=(const A &); // expected-note 2 {{declared private here}}
+ void operator=(const A &); // expected-note 2 {{implicitly declared private here}}
};
class Test1 { A a; }; // expected-error {{private member}}
@@ -458,3 +458,33 @@
// testing PR7281, earlier in this file.
void b(A* x) { throw x; }
}
+
+// PR7930
+namespace test20 {
+ class Foo {
+ Foo(); // expected-note {{implicitly declared private here}}
+ };
+ Foo::Foo() {}
+
+ void test() {
+ Foo a; // expected-error {{calling a private constructor}}
+ }
+}
+
+namespace test21 {
+ template <class T> class A {
+ void foo();
+ void bar();
+ class Inner; // expected-note {{implicitly declared private here}}
+ public:
+ void baz();
+ };
+ template <class T> class A<T>::Inner {};
+ class B {
+ template <class T> class A<T>::Inner;
+ };
+
+ void test() {
+ A<int>::Inner i; // expected-error {{'Inner' is a private member}}
+ }
+}