When the condition of a switch() statement is semantically invalid,
still parse the body of the switch to try to avoid spurious
diagnostics. Fixes PR5606.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@89847 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/lib/Parse/ParseStmt.cpp b/lib/Parse/ParseStmt.cpp
index 2022fa5..c87010e 100644
--- a/lib/Parse/ParseStmt.cpp
+++ b/lib/Parse/ParseStmt.cpp
@@ -715,9 +715,7 @@
FullExprArg FullCond(Actions.FullExpr(Cond));
- OwningStmtResult Switch(Actions);
- if (!Cond.isInvalid() || CondVar.get())
- Switch = Actions.ActOnStartOfSwitchStmt(FullCond, CondVar);
+ OwningStmtResult Switch = Actions.ActOnStartOfSwitchStmt(FullCond, CondVar);
// C99 6.8.4p3 - In C99, the body of the switch statement is a scope, even if
// there is no compound stmt. C90 does not have this clause. We only do this