Improve support for out-of-line definitions of nested templates and
their members, including member class template, member function
templates, and member classes and functions of member templates.
To actually parse the nested-name-specifiers that qualify the name of
an out-of-line definition of a member template, e.g.,
template<typename X> template<typename Y>
X Outer<X>::Inner1<Y>::foo(Y) {
return X();
}
we need to look for the template names (e.g., "Inner1") as a member of
the current instantiation (Outer<X>), even before we have entered the
scope of the current instantiation. Since we can't do this in general
(i.e., we should not be looking into all dependent
nested-name-specifiers as if they were the current instantiation), we
rely on the parser to tell us when it is parsing a declaration
specifier sequence, and, therefore, when we should consider the
current scope specifier to be a current instantiation.
Printing of complicated, dependent nested-name-specifiers may be
somewhat broken by this commit; I'll add tests for this issue and fix
the problem (if it still exists) in a subsequent commit.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@80044 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/lib/Sema/TreeTransform.h b/lib/Sema/TreeTransform.h
index 8220ec3..5d34e07 100644
--- a/lib/Sema/TreeTransform.h
+++ b/lib/Sema/TreeTransform.h
@@ -4378,7 +4378,8 @@
SS.setScopeRep(Prefix);
return static_cast<NestedNameSpecifier *>(
SemaRef.ActOnCXXNestedNameSpecifier(0, SS, Range.getEnd(),
- Range.getEnd(), II));
+ Range.getEnd(), II,
+ false));
}
template<typename Derived>
@@ -4435,7 +4436,7 @@
SS.setRange(SourceRange(getDerived().getBaseLocation()));
SS.setScopeRep(Qualifier);
Sema::TemplateTy Template;
- TemplateNameKind TNK = SemaRef.isTemplateName(II, 0, Template, &SS);
+ TemplateNameKind TNK = SemaRef.isTemplateName(II, 0, &SS, false, Template);
if (TNK == TNK_Non_template) {
SemaRef.Diag(getDerived().getBaseLocation(),
diag::err_template_kw_refers_to_non_template)