Teach TemplateSpecializationTypeLoc::initializeArgLocs() to actually
generate meaningful [*] template argument location information.
[*] Well, as meaningful as possible, given that this entire code path
is a hack for when we've lost type-source information.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@124211 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp b/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
index 2d2c3ea..78f8d5e 100644
--- a/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
+++ b/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
@@ -5901,7 +5901,8 @@
if (InnerTSI)
Builder.pushFullCopy(InnerTSI->getTypeLoc());
else
- Builder.push<TemplateSpecializationTypeLoc>(T).initialize(TemplateLoc);
+ Builder.push<TemplateSpecializationTypeLoc>(T).initialize(Context,
+ TemplateLoc);
/* Note: NNS already embedded in template specialization type T. */
T = Context.getElaboratedType(ETK_Typename, /*NNS=*/0, T);
@@ -5937,7 +5938,8 @@
for (unsigned I = 0, E = TST->getNumArgs(); I != E; ++I)
TL.setArgLocInfo(I, TSTL.getArgLocInfo(I));
} else {
- TL.initializeLocal(SourceLocation());
+ // FIXME: Poor source-location information here.
+ TL.initializeLocal(Context, TemplateLoc);
}
TL.setKeywordLoc(TypenameLoc);
TL.setQualifierRange(SS.getRange());