Further improvement to wording of overload resolution diagnostics, and including
the sole parameter name in the diagnostic in more cases. Patch by Terry Long!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@156807 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/test/SemaCXX/overload-member-call.cpp b/test/SemaCXX/overload-member-call.cpp
index 31dac19..0958620 100644
--- a/test/SemaCXX/overload-member-call.cpp
+++ b/test/SemaCXX/overload-member-call.cpp
@@ -83,10 +83,10 @@
void baz(int i); // expected-note {{candidate function not viable: no known conversion from 'const test1::A' to 'int' for 1st argument}}
// PR 11857
- void foo(int n); // expected-note {{candidate function not viable: requires argument 'n', but 2 were provided}}
- void foo(unsigned n = 10); // expected-note {{candidate function not viable: requires at most argument 'n', but 2 were provided}}
- void rab(double n, int u = 0); // expected-note {{candidate function not viable: requires at least argument 'n', but none were provided}}
- void rab(int n, int u = 0); // expected-note {{candidate function not viable: requires at least argument 'n', but none were provided}}
+ void foo(int n); // expected-note {{candidate function not viable: requires single argument 'n', but 2 arguments were provided}}
+ void foo(unsigned n = 10); // expected-note {{candidate function not viable: allows at most single argument 'n', but 2 arguments were provided}}
+ void rab(double n, int u = 0); // expected-note {{candidate function not viable: requires at least argument 'n', but no arguments were provided}}
+ void rab(int n, int u = 0); // expected-note {{candidate function not viable: requires at least argument 'n', but no arguments were provided}}
void zab(double n = 0.0, int u = 0); // expected-note {{candidate function not viable: requires at most 2 arguments, but 3 were provided}}
void zab(int n = 0, int u = 0); // expected-note {{candidate function not viable: requires at most 2 arguments, but 3 were provided}}
};