Fix a bug where we would not emit secondary vtables for bases of a primary base.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@96351 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/test/CodeGenCXX/vtable-layout.cpp b/test/CodeGenCXX/vtable-layout.cpp
index 8fbe486..b714511 100644
--- a/test/CodeGenCXX/vtable-layout.cpp
+++ b/test/CodeGenCXX/vtable-layout.cpp
@@ -365,3 +365,33 @@
void B::f() { }
}
+
+namespace Test10 {
+
+// Test for a bug where we would not emit secondary vtables for bases
+// of a primary base.
+struct A1 { virtual void a1(); };
+struct A2 { virtual void a2(); };
+
+// CHECK: Vtable for 'Test10::C' (7 entries).
+// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | offset_to_top (0)
+// CHECK-NEXT: 1 | Test10::C RTTI
+// CHECK-NEXT: -- (Test10::A1, 0) vtable address --
+// CHECK-NEXT: -- (Test10::B, 0) vtable address --
+// CHECK-NEXT: -- (Test10::C, 0) vtable address --
+// CHECK-NEXT: 2 | void Test10::A1::a1()
+// CHECK-NEXT: 3 | void Test10::C::f()
+// CHECK-NEXT: 4 | offset_to_top (-8)
+// CHECK-NEXT: 5 | Test10::C RTTI
+// CHECK-NEXT: -- (Test10::A2, 8) vtable address --
+// CHECK-NEXT: 6 | void Test10::A2::a2()
+struct B : A1, A2 {
+ int b;
+};
+
+struct C : B {
+ virtual void f();
+};
+void C::f() { }
+
+}