Improve handling of base initializers. We now parse initializers in out of line decls, such as:
class C {
C() { }
int a;
};
C::C() : a(10) { }
We also diagnose when initializers are used on declarations that aren't constructors:
t.cpp:1:10: error: only constructors take base initializers
void f() : a(10) { }
^
Doug and/or Sebastian: I'd appreciate a review, especially the nested-name-spec test results (from the looks of it we now match gcc in that test.)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@67672 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/test/SemaCXX/constructor-initializer.cpp b/test/SemaCXX/constructor-initializer.cpp
index 81d56ea..d0c978a 100644
--- a/test/SemaCXX/constructor-initializer.cpp
+++ b/test/SemaCXX/constructor-initializer.cpp
@@ -45,3 +45,12 @@
class G : A {
G() : A(10); // expected-error{{expected '{'}}
};
+
+void f() : a(242) { } // expected-error{{only constructors take base initializers}}
+
+class H : A {
+ H();
+};
+
+H::H() : A(10) { }
+