Don't put too much thought into whether or not to capture a
type-dependent intermediate result in a postfix ++ pseudo-
object operation.
Test case by Tong Shen.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@179637 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/test/SemaCXX/MicrosoftExtensions.cpp b/test/SemaCXX/MicrosoftExtensions.cpp
index 07b93fa..ab3ff69 100644
--- a/test/SemaCXX/MicrosoftExtensions.cpp
+++ b/test/SemaCXX/MicrosoftExtensions.cpp
@@ -302,13 +302,14 @@
T GetV() { return 0; }
void SetV(T v) {}
void f() { V = this->V; V < this->V; }
- //void g() { V++; }
- //void h() { V*=2; }
+ void g() { V++; }
+ void h() { V*=2; }
};
struct SP10 {
SP10(int v) {}
bool operator<(const SP10& v) { return true; }
SP10 operator*(int v) { return *this; }
+ SP10 operator+(int v) { return *this; }
SP10& operator=(const SP10& v) { return *this; }
};
void TestSP9() {
@@ -329,6 +330,6 @@
SP9<SP10> c3;
c3.f(); // Overloaded binary op operand
- //c3.g(); // Overloaded incdec op operand
- //c3.h(); // Overloaded unary op operand
+ c3.g(); // Overloaded incdec op operand
+ c3.h(); // Overloaded unary op operand
}