Fix handling of the GNU "t ? : f" extension to the conditional
operator in C++, and verify that template instantiation for the
condition operator does the right thing.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@72127 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiateExpr.cpp b/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiateExpr.cpp
index 9dda383..2589e30 100644
--- a/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiateExpr.cpp
+++ b/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiateExpr.cpp
@@ -427,13 +427,13 @@
if (Cond.isInvalid())
return SemaRef.ExprError();
- // FIXME: use getLHS() and cope with NULLness
- Sema::OwningExprResult True = Visit(E->getTrueExpr());
- if (True.isInvalid())
+ Sema::OwningExprResult LHS = SemaRef.InstantiateExpr(E->getLHS(),
+ TemplateArgs);
+ if (LHS.isInvalid())
return SemaRef.ExprError();
- Sema::OwningExprResult False = Visit(E->getFalseExpr());
- if (False.isInvalid())
+ Sema::OwningExprResult RHS = Visit(E->getRHS());
+ if (RHS.isInvalid())
return SemaRef.ExprError();
if (!E->isTypeDependent()) {
@@ -442,15 +442,15 @@
// Instead, we just build the new conditional operator call expression.
return SemaRef.Owned(new (SemaRef.Context) ConditionalOperator(
Cond.takeAs<Expr>(),
- True.takeAs<Expr>(),
- False.takeAs<Expr>(),
+ LHS.takeAs<Expr>(),
+ RHS.takeAs<Expr>(),
E->getType()));
}
return SemaRef.ActOnConditionalOp(/*FIXME*/E->getCond()->getLocEnd(),
/*FIXME*/E->getFalseExpr()->getLocStart(),
- move(Cond), move(True), move(False));
+ move(Cond), move(LHS), move(RHS));
}
Sema::OwningExprResult