Add a missing case for default constructor deletion.
This case is tested by the fact that the modified test produces
significatly worse diagnostics. That's on the list.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@131759 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/test/SemaCXX/value-initialization.cpp b/test/SemaCXX/value-initialization.cpp
index 10520fb..dfe0f46 100644
--- a/test/SemaCXX/value-initialization.cpp
+++ b/test/SemaCXX/value-initialization.cpp
@@ -1,12 +1,11 @@
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s -std=c++0x
-struct A { // expected-error {{implicit default constructor for 'A' must explicitly initialize the const member 'i'}} \
- // expected-warning{{struct 'A' does not declare any constructor to initialize its non-modifiable members}}
- const int i; // expected-note {{declared here}} \
- // expected-note{{const member 'i' will never be initialized}}
+struct A { //expected-note {{marked deleted here}} \
+ // expected-warning {{does not declare any constructor to initialize}}
+ const int i; // expected-note{{const member 'i' will never be initialized}}
virtual void f() { }
};
int main () {
- (void)A(); // expected-note {{first required here}}
+ (void)A(); // expected-error {{call to deleted constructor}}
}