Check in LLVM r95781.
diff --git a/test/SemaCXX/direct-initializer.cpp b/test/SemaCXX/direct-initializer.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6601a3d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/SemaCXX/direct-initializer.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
+
+int x(1);
+int (x2)(1);
+
+void f() {
+ int x(1);
+ int (x2)(1);
+ for (int x(1);;) {}
+}
+
+class Y {
+ explicit Y(float);
+};
+
+class X { // expected-note{{candidate constructor (the implicit copy constructor)}}
+public:
+ explicit X(int); // expected-note{{candidate constructor}}
+ X(float, float, float); // expected-note{{candidate constructor}}
+ X(float, Y); // expected-note{{candidate constructor}}
+};
+
+class Z { // expected-note{{candidate constructor (the implicit copy constructor)}}
+public:
+ Z(int); // expected-note{{candidate constructor}}
+};
+
+void g() {
+ X x1(5);
+ X x2(1.0, 3, 4.2);
+ X x3(1.0, 1.0); // expected-error{{no matching constructor for initialization of 'class X'}}
+ Y y(1.0);
+ X x4(3.14, y);
+
+ Z z; // expected-error{{no matching constructor for initialization of 'class Z'}}
+}
+
+struct Base {
+ operator int*() const;
+};
+
+struct Derived : Base {
+ operator int*(); // expected-note {{candidate function}}
+};
+
+void foo(const Derived cd, Derived d) {
+ int *pi = cd; // expected-error {{no viable conversion from 'struct Derived const' to 'int *'}}
+ int *ppi = d;
+
+}