Mass rename C1x references to C11. The name hasn't proliferated like "C++0x" so this patch is surprisingly small.
Also drop -Wc1x-extensions in favor of -Wc11-extensions. I don't think we need to keep this around for compatibility.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@147221 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/lib/Parse/ParseDeclCXX.cpp b/lib/Parse/ParseDeclCXX.cpp
index 58e16bf..5bae0e4 100644
--- a/lib/Parse/ParseDeclCXX.cpp
+++ b/lib/Parse/ParseDeclCXX.cpp
@@ -573,20 +573,20 @@
IsTypeName, TypenameLoc);
}
-/// ParseStaticAssertDeclaration - Parse C++0x or C1X static_assert-declaration.
+/// ParseStaticAssertDeclaration - Parse C++0x or C11 static_assert-declaration.
///
/// [C++0x] static_assert-declaration:
/// static_assert ( constant-expression , string-literal ) ;
///
-/// [C1X] static_assert-declaration:
+/// [C11] static_assert-declaration:
/// _Static_assert ( constant-expression , string-literal ) ;
///
Decl *Parser::ParseStaticAssertDeclaration(SourceLocation &DeclEnd){
assert((Tok.is(tok::kw_static_assert) || Tok.is(tok::kw__Static_assert)) &&
"Not a static_assert declaration");
- if (Tok.is(tok::kw__Static_assert) && !getLang().C1X)
- Diag(Tok, diag::ext_c1x_static_assert);
+ if (Tok.is(tok::kw__Static_assert) && !getLang().C11)
+ Diag(Tok, diag::ext_c11_static_assert);
if (Tok.is(tok::kw_static_assert))
Diag(Tok, diag::warn_cxx98_compat_static_assert);