minor verbiage
diff --git a/doc/html/itunes.html b/doc/html/itunes.html
index a390372..a00af05 100644
--- a/doc/html/itunes.html
+++ b/doc/html/itunes.html
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
<meta name="keywords" content="free,lossless,audio,codec,encoder,decoder,compression,compressor,archival,archive,archiving,backup,music" />
<link rel="shortcut icon" type="image/x-icon" href="favicon.ico" />
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="flac.css" />
- <title>FLAC - id</title>
+ <title>FLAC - itunes</title>
</head>
<body>
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@
<div class="box_body">
Would you like iTunes to support FLAC? So would we!<br />
<br />
- Due to the design of iTunes, only Apple can add support for FLAC <a href="#footnote1">[1]</a>. And why wouldn't they? FLAC usage is accelerating, <a href="links.html#music">many bands</a> -- the same hip, influential people Apple courts -- are already distributing music in FLAC format, and users are demanding it in the iTunes forums:<br />
+ Due to the design of iTunes, only Apple can add support for FLAC <a href="#footnote1">[1]</a>. And why wouldn't they? FLAC usage is accelerating, <a href="links.html#music">many bands</a> like Pearl Jam, Phish, Dave Matthews Band, Metallica -- the same hip, influential people whose fans Apple courts -- are already distributing music in FLAC format, and users are clamoring for it in the iTunes forums:<br />
<ul style="list-style-type: none">
<li><a href="http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=784174&#784174">[2]</a> <i>"I have seen a lot of people on live music message boards turn away from the iPod because there are other music players that support FLAC. I am on the verge... and I am an Apple die-hard!"</i></li>
<li><a href="http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=799873&#799873">[3]</a> <i>"If your source material is FLAC (as many bands have gone this way to distribute online music) your choice is to use another music player ..."</i></li>