Update readme
diff --git a/README.rst b/README.rst
index 77fe2b4..7511d16 100644
--- a/README.rst
+++ b/README.rst
@@ -377,13 +377,13 @@
printf 2.6 29 26
printf+string 16.4 29 26
iostreams 31.1 59 55
-fmt 19.0 37 34
+{fmt} 19.0 37 34
tinyformat 44.0 103 97
Boost Format 91.9 226 203
Folly Format 115.7 101 88
============= =============== ==================== ==================
-As you can see, fmt has 60% less overhead in terms of resulting binary code
+As you can see, {fmt} has 60% less overhead in terms of resulting binary code
size compared to iostreams and comes pretty close to ``printf``. Boost Format
and Folly Format have the largest overheads.
@@ -398,16 +398,15 @@
printf 2.2 33 30
printf+string 16.0 33 30
iostreams 28.3 56 52
-fmt 18.2 59 50
+{fmt} 18.2 59 50
tinyformat 32.6 88 82
Boost Format 54.1 365 303
Folly Format 79.9 445 430
============= =============== ==================== ==================
-``libc``, ``lib(std)c++`` and ``libfmt`` are all linked as shared
-libraries to compare formatting function overhead only. Boost Format
-and tinyformat are header-only libraries so they don't provide any
-linkage options.
+``libc``, ``lib(std)c++`` and ``libfmt`` are all linked as shared libraries to
+compare formatting function overhead only. Boost Format and tinyformat are
+header-only libraries so they don't provide any linkage options.
Running the tests
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~