G M: Changes all references to "x inline" to "inline x" where x = _libcpp_always_inline or _libcpp_inline_visibility macros.
The patch touches these files:
locale
array
deque
new
string
utility
vector
__bit_reference
__split_buffer
locale_win32.h
There is no intended functionality change and it is expected that reversing the position of the inline keyword with regard to the other keywords does not change the meaning of anything, least not for apple/Linux etc.
It is intended to make libcxx more consistent with itself and to prevent the 1000 or so
"inline.cpp(3) : warning C4141: 'inline' : used more than once" warnings that MS's cl.exe compiler emits without this patch, i.e. if inline is not the first keyword before a function name etc.
Prefer "inline [other inline related keyword]" over "[other related keyword] inline".
After this patch, libcxx should be consistent to this pattern.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@191987 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/include/__split_buffer b/include/__split_buffer
index f1c404f..1d529cb 100644
--- a/include/__split_buffer
+++ b/include/__split_buffer
@@ -285,7 +285,7 @@
}
template <class _Tp, class _Allocator>
-_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY inline
+inline _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY
void
__split_buffer<_Tp, _Allocator>::__destruct_at_begin(pointer __new_begin, false_type)
{
@@ -294,7 +294,7 @@
}
template <class _Tp, class _Allocator>
-_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY inline
+inline _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY
void
__split_buffer<_Tp, _Allocator>::__destruct_at_begin(pointer __new_begin, true_type)
{
@@ -302,7 +302,7 @@
}
template <class _Tp, class _Allocator>
-_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY inline
+inline _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY
void
__split_buffer<_Tp, _Allocator>::__destruct_at_end(pointer __new_last, false_type) _NOEXCEPT
{
@@ -311,7 +311,7 @@
}
template <class _Tp, class _Allocator>
-_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY inline
+inline _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY
void
__split_buffer<_Tp, _Allocator>::__destruct_at_end(pointer __new_last, true_type) _NOEXCEPT
{
@@ -328,7 +328,7 @@
}
template <class _Tp, class _Allocator>
-_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY inline
+inline _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY
__split_buffer<_Tp, _Allocator>::__split_buffer()
_NOEXCEPT_(is_nothrow_default_constructible<allocator_type>::value)
: __first_(nullptr), __begin_(nullptr), __end_(nullptr), __end_cap_(nullptr)
@@ -336,14 +336,14 @@
}
template <class _Tp, class _Allocator>
-_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY inline
+inline _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY
__split_buffer<_Tp, _Allocator>::__split_buffer(__alloc_rr& __a)
: __first_(nullptr), __begin_(nullptr), __end_(nullptr), __end_cap_(nullptr, __a)
{
}
template <class _Tp, class _Allocator>
-_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY inline
+inline _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY
__split_buffer<_Tp, _Allocator>::__split_buffer(const __alloc_rr& __a)
: __first_(nullptr), __begin_(nullptr), __end_(nullptr), __end_cap_(nullptr, __a)
{
@@ -541,7 +541,7 @@
#endif // _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_RVALUE_REFERENCES
template <class _Tp, class _Allocator>
-_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY inline
+inline _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY
void
__split_buffer<_Tp, _Allocator>::push_back(const_reference __x)
{
@@ -640,7 +640,7 @@
#endif // _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_RVALUE_REFERENCES
template <class _Tp, class _Allocator>
-_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY inline
+inline _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY
void
swap(__split_buffer<_Tp, _Allocator>& __x, __split_buffer<_Tp, _Allocator>& __y)
_NOEXCEPT_(_NOEXCEPT_(__x.swap(__y)))