Correct for new rules regarding implicitly deleted special members. http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=10191
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@134248 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/include/unordered_set b/include/unordered_set
index 2798a61..2ef5433 100644
--- a/include/unordered_set
+++ b/include/unordered_set
@@ -373,7 +373,12 @@
const hasher& __hf, const key_equal& __eql,
const allocator_type& __a);
// ~unordered_set() = default;
- // unordered_set& operator=(const unordered_set& __u) = default;
+ _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY
+ unordered_set& operator=(const unordered_set& __u)
+ {
+ __table_ = __u.__table_;
+ return *this;
+ }
#ifndef _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_RVALUE_REFERENCES
unordered_set& operator=(unordered_set&& __u)
_NOEXCEPT_(is_nothrow_move_assignable<__table>::value);
@@ -766,7 +771,12 @@
const hasher& __hf, const key_equal& __eql,
const allocator_type& __a);
// ~unordered_multiset() = default;
- // unordered_multiset& operator=(const unordered_multiset& __u) = default;
+ _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY
+ unordered_multiset& operator=(const unordered_multiset& __u)
+ {
+ __table_ = __u.__table_;
+ return *this;
+ }
#ifndef _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_RVALUE_REFERENCES
unordered_multiset& operator=(unordered_multiset&& __u)
_NOEXCEPT_(is_nothrow_move_assignable<__table>::value);