[NFC] Rename _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY to _LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS
The name _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY is no longer accurate because both
_LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS and _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY expand to
__attribute__((__type_visibility__)) with Clang. The only remaining difference
is that _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY can be applied to templates whereas
_LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS cannot (due to dllimport/dllexport not being allowed on
templates).
This patch renames _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY to _LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@291035 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/include/complex b/include/complex
index 22f568f..d41971b 100644
--- a/include/complex
+++ b/include/complex
@@ -252,13 +252,13 @@
_LIBCPP_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_STD
-template<class _Tp> class _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY complex;
+template<class _Tp> class _LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS complex;
template<class _Tp> complex<_Tp> operator*(const complex<_Tp>& __z, const complex<_Tp>& __w);
template<class _Tp> complex<_Tp> operator/(const complex<_Tp>& __x, const complex<_Tp>& __y);
template<class _Tp>
-class _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY complex
+class _LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS complex
{
public:
typedef _Tp value_type;
@@ -316,11 +316,11 @@
}
};
-template<> class _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY complex<double>;
-template<> class _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY complex<long double>;
+template<> class _LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS complex<double>;
+template<> class _LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS complex<long double>;
template<>
-class _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY complex<float>
+class _LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS complex<float>
{
float __re_;
float __im_;
@@ -378,7 +378,7 @@
};
template<>
-class _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY complex<double>
+class _LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS complex<double>
{
double __re_;
double __im_;
@@ -436,7 +436,7 @@
};
template<>
-class _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY complex<long double>
+class _LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS complex<long double>
{
long double __re_;
long double __im_;