is_destructible for function types was mistakenly returning true instead of false. This is true in both C++11 and C++1y, but has been clarified by the post C++11 LWG issue 2049.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@189687 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/www/cxx1y_status.html b/www/cxx1y_status.html
index 6bf68e1..c1f6109 100644
--- a/www/cxx1y_status.html
+++ b/www/cxx1y_status.html
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@
<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2005">2005</a></td><td>unordered_map::insert(T&&) protection should apply to map too</td><td>Portland</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2011">2011</a></td><td>Unexpected output required of strings</td><td>Portland</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2048">2048</a></td><td>Unnecessary mem_fn overloads</td><td>Portland</td><td></td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2049">2049</a></td><td>is_destructible is underspecified</td><td>Portland</td><td></td></tr>
+ <tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2049">2049</a></td><td>is_destructible is underspecified</td><td>Portland</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2056">2056</a></td><td>future_errc enums start with value 0 (invalid value for broken_promise)</td><td>Portland</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2058">2058</a></td><td>valarray and begin/end</td><td>Portland</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
<tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>