Applied a spelling patch from Geert Kloosterman to xml.html, and regenerated
the web site, Daniel
diff --git a/doc/example.html b/doc/example.html
index c5413e3..07a47cb 100644
--- a/doc/example.html
+++ b/doc/example.html
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@
</gjob:Jobs>
</gjob:Helping></pre>
<p>While loading the XML file into an internal DOM tree is a matter of
-calling only a couple of functions, browsing the tree to gather the ata and
+calling only a couple of functions, browsing the tree to gather the data and
generate the internal structures is harder, and more error prone.</p>
<p>The suggested principle is to be tolerant with respect to the input
structure. For example, the ordering of the attributes is not significant,
@@ -200,8 +200,8 @@
<p>Here are a couple of things to notice:</p>
<ul>
<li>Usually a recursive parsing style is the more convenient one: XML data
- is by nature subject to repetitive constructs and usually exibits highly
- stuctured patterns.</li>
+ is by nature subject to repetitive constructs and usually exhibits highly
+ structured patterns.</li>
<li>The two arguments of type <em>xmlDocPtr</em> and <em>xmlNsPtr</em>,
i.e. the pointer to the global XML document and the namespace reserved to
the application. Document wide information are needed for example to
@@ -267,7 +267,7 @@
return(ret);
}</pre>
<p>Once you are used to it, writing this kind of code is quite simple, but
-boring. Ultimately, it could be possble to write stubbers taking either C
+boring. Ultimately, it could be possible to write stubbers taking either C
data structure definitions, a set of XML examples or an XML DTD and produce
the code needed to import and export the content between C data and XML
storage. This is left as an exercise to the reader :-)</p>