Added an FAQ, Daniel.
diff --git a/doc/FAQ.html b/doc/FAQ.html
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9a1e2fd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/FAQ.html
@@ -0,0 +1,247 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"
+                      "http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd">
+<html>
+<head>
+  <title>Libxml Frequently asqued Questions</title>
+  <meta name="GENERATOR" content="amaya V2.1">
+  <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html">
+</head>
+
+<body bgcolor="#ffffff">
+<h1 align="center">Libxml Frequently Asqued Questions</h1>
+
+<p>Location: <a
+href="http://xmlsoft.org/FAQ.html">http://xmlsoft.org/FAQ.html</a></p>
+
+<p>Libxml home page: <a href="http://xmlsoft.org/">http://xmlsoft.org/</a></p>
+
+<p>Mailing-list archive:  <a
+href="http://xmlsoft.org/messages/">http://xmlsoft.org/messages/</a></p>
+
+<p>Version: $Version$</p>
+
+<p>Table of Content:</p>
+<ul>
+  <li><a href="#Licence">Licence(s)</a></li>
+  <li><a href="#Installati">Installation</a></li>
+  <li><a href="#Compilatio">Compilation</a></li>
+  <li><a href="#Developper">Developper corner</a></li>
+</ul>
+
+<h2><a name="Licence">Licence</a>(s)</h2>
+<ol>
+  <li><em>Licensing Terms for libxml</em>
+    <p>libxml is released under 2 (compatible) licences:</p>
+    <ul>
+      <li>the <a href="http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/lgpl.html">LGPL</a>: GNU
+        Library General Public License</li>
+      <li>the <a
+        href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/copyright-software-19980720.html">W3C
+        IPR</a>: very similar to the XWindow licence</li>
+    </ul>
+  </li>
+  <li><em>Can I embed libxml in a proprietary application ?</em>
+    <p>Yes. The W3C IPR allows you to also keep proprietary the changes you
+    made to libxml, but it would be graceful to provide back bugfixes and
+    improvements as patches for possible incorporation in the main
+    developement tree</p>
+  </li>
+</ol>
+
+<h2><a name="Installati">Installation</a></h2>
+<ol>
+  <li><em>Where can I get libxml</em> ?
+    <p>The original distribution comes from <a
+    href="ftp://rpmfind.net/pub/libxml/">rpmfind.net</a> or <a
+    href="ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/stable/sources/libxml/">gnome.org</a></p>
+    <p>Most linux and Bsd distribution includes libxml, this is probably the
+    safer way for end-users</p>
+    <p>David Doolin provides precompiled Windows versions at <a
+    href="http://www.ce.berkeley.edu/~doolin/code/libxmlwin32/    
+    ">http://www.ce.berkeley.edu/~doolin/code/libxmlwin32/</a></p>
+  </li>
+  <li><em>I see libxml and libxml2 releases, which one should I install ?</em>
+    <ul>
+      <li>If you are not concerned by any existing backward compatibility with
+        existing application, install libxml2 only</li>
+      <li>If you are not doing development, you can safely install both.
+        usually the packages <a
+        href="http://rpmfind.net/linux/RPM/libxml.html">libxml</a> and <a
+        href="http://rpmfind.net/linux/RPM/libxml2.html">libxml2</a> are
+        compatible (this is not the case for development packages)</li>
+      <li>If you are a developper and your system provides separate packaging
+        for shared libraries and the development components, it is possible to
+        install libxml and libxml2, and depending on your development needs
+        have either <a
+        href="http://rpmfind.net/linux/RPM/libxml-devel.html">libxml-devel</a>
+        or <a
+        href="http://rpmfind.net/linux/RPM/libxml2-devel.html">libxml2-devel</a>
+        too</li>
+      <li>If you are developping a new application, please develop against
+        libxml2(-devel)</li>
+    </ul>
+  </li>
+  <li><em>I can't install the libxml package it conflicts with libxml0</em>
+    <p>You probably have an old libxml0 package used to provide the shared
+    library for libxml.so.0, you can probably safely remove it. Anyway the
+    libxml packages provided on <a
+    href="ftp://rpmfind.net/pub/libxml/">rpmfind.net</a> provides
+    libxml.so.0</p>
+  </li>
+</ol>
+
+<h2><a name="Compilatio">Compilation</a></h2>
+<ol>
+  <li><em>What is the process to compile libxml ?</em>
+    <p>As most UNIX libraries libxml follows the "standard":</p>
+    <p><code>gunzip -c xxx.tar.gz | tar xvf -</code></p>
+    <p><code>cd libxml-xxxx</code></p>
+    <p><code>./configure --help</code></p>
+    <p>to see the options, then the compilation/installation proper</p>
+    <p><code>./configure [possible options]</code></p>
+    <p><code>make</code></p>
+    <p><code>make install</code></p>
+    <p>At that point you may have to rerun ldconfig or similar utility to
+    update your list of installed shared libs.</p>
+  </li>
+  <li><em>What other libraries are needed to compile/install libxml ?</em>
+    <p>Libxml does not requires any other library, the normal C ANSI API
+    should be sufficient (please report any violation to this rule you may
+    find).</p>
+    <p>However if found at configuration time libxml will deect and use the
+    following libs:</p>
+    <ul>
+      <li><a href="http://www.info-zip.org/pub/infozip/zlib/">libz</a>: a
+        highly portable and available widely compression library</li>
+      <li>iconv: a powerful character encoding conversion library. It's
+        included by default on recent glibc libraries, so it doesn't need to
+        be installed specifically on linux. It seems it's now <a
+        href="http://www.opennc.org/onlinepubs/7908799/xsh/iconv.html">part of
+        the official UNIX</a> specification, though I could not find a home
+        page for the project.</li>
+    </ul>
+  </li>
+  <li><em>The Makefile for the example gjobread is not generated</em>
+    <p>This is due to a circular dependancy in automake. No solution found so
+    far (if you know how to fix this the patch will be very welcome), that
+    failure won't affect the actually building of the xml library. You can
+    later go in and create the example Makefile by hand or reuse the
+    following:</p>
+    <pre>CC=gcc
+        CFLAGS=`xml-config --cflags`
+        LDFLAGS=`xml-config --libs`
+
+        all: gjobread
+
+        clean:
+        &lt;TAB>@(rm -f gjobread gjobread.o)
+
+        gjobread.o : gjobread.c
+        &lt;TAB>$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -c gjobread.c
+
+        gjobread: gjobread.o
+        &lt;TAB>$(CC) -o gjobread gjobread.o $(LDFLAGS)</pre>
+  </li>
+  <li><em>libxml does not compile with HP-UX's optional ANSI-C compiler</em>
+    <p>this is due to macro limitations. Try to add " -Wp,-H16800 -Ae" to the
+    CFLAGS</p>
+    <p>you can also install and use gcc instead or use a precompiled version
+    of libxml, both available from the <a
+    href="http://hpux.cae.wisc.edu/hppd/auto/summary_all.html">HP-UX Porting
+    and Archive Centre</a></p>
+  </li>
+  <li><em>make check fails on some platforms</em>
+    <p>Sometime the regression tests results don't completely match the value
+    produced by the parser, and the makefile uses diff to print the delta. On
+    some platforms the diff return breaks the compilation process, if the diff
+    is small this is probably not a serious problem</p>
+  </li>
+</ol>
+
+<h2><a name="Developper">Developper</a> corner</h2>
+<ol>
+  <li><em>I get compilation errors of existing code like when accessing
+    <strong>root</strong> or <strong>childs fields</strong> of nodes</em>
+    <p>You are compiling code developped for libxml version 1 and using a
+    libxml2 developement environment. Either switch back to libxml v1 devel or
+    even better fix the code to compile with libxml2 (or both) by <a
+    href="upgrade.html">following the instructions</a>.</p>
+  </li>
+  <li><em>I get compilation errors about non existing
+    <strong>xmlRootNode</strong> or <strong>xmlChildrenNode</strong>
+    fields</em>
+    <p>The source code you are using has been <a
+    href="upgrade.html">upgraded</a> to be able to compile with both libxml
+    and libxml2, but you need to install a more recent version: libxml(-devel)
+    >= 1.8.8 or libxml2(-devel) >= 2.1.0</p>
+  </li>
+  <li><em>XPath implementation looks seriously broken</em>
+    <p>True, it's incomplete and the version released in 2.0.0 was nearly
+    unusable. A set of patches from <a href="http://www.picdar.co.uk/">Picdar
+    Technology</a> have been integrated in 2.1.0 fixing the most nasty bugs.
+    But there is still bugs and its incomplete. Patches and bug reports are
+    welcome. This will be worked out, XPath implementation is not abandonned,
+    just a momentary lack of time.</p>
+  </li>
+  <li><em>The example provided in the web page does not compile</em>
+    <p>It's hard to maintain the documentation in sync with the code
+    &lt;grin/> ...</p>
+    <p>Check the previous points 1/ and 2/ raised before, and send
+    patches.</p>
+  </li>
+  <li><em>Where can I get more examples and informations than in the web
+    page</em>
+    <p>Ideally a libxml book would be nice. I have no such plan ... But you
+    can:</p>
+    <ul>
+      <li>check more deeply the <a href="libxml.html">existing generated
+        doc</a></li>
+      <li>looks for examples of use for libxml function using the Gnome code
+        for example the following will query the full Gnome CVs base for the
+        use of the <strong>xmlAddChild()</strong> function:
+        <p><a
+        href="http://cvs.gnome.org/lxr/search?string=xmlAddChild">http://cvs.gnome.org/lxr/search?string=xmlAddChild</a></p>
+        <p>This may be slow, a large hardware donation to the gnome project
+        could cure this :-)</p>
+      </li>
+      <li><a
+        href="http://cvs.gnome.org/bonsai/rview.cgi?cvsroot=/cvs/gnome&dir=gnome-xml">Browse
+        the libxml source</a>, I try to write code as clean and documented as
+        possible, so looking at it may be helpful</li>
+    </ul>
+  </li>
+  <li>What about C++ ?
+    <p>libxml is written in pure C in order to allow easy reuse on a number of
+    platforms, including embedded systems. I don't intend to convert to
+    C++.</p>
+    <p>There is however a C++ wrapper provided by Ari Johnson
+    &lt;ari@btigate.com> which may fullfill your needs:</p>
+    <p>Website: <a
+    href="http://lusis.org/~ari/xml++/">http://lusis.org/~ari/xml++/</a></p>
+    <p>Download: <a
+    href="http://lusis.org/~ari/xml++/libxml++.tar.gz">http://lusis.org/~ari/xml++/libxml++.tar.gz</a></p>
+  </li>
+  <li>How to validate a document a posteriori ?
+    <p>It is possible to validate documents which had not been validated at
+    initial parsing time or documents who have been built from scratch using
+    the API. Use the <a
+    href="http://xmlsoft.org/gnome-xml-valid.html#XMLVALIDATEDTD">xmlValidateDtd()</a>
+    function. It is also possible to simply add a Dtd to an existing
+    document:</p>
+    <pre>xmlDocPtr doc; /* your existing document */
+        xmlDtdPtr dtd = xmlParseDTD(NULL, filename_of_dtd); /* parse the DTD */
+        dtd->name = xmlStrDup((xmlChar*)"root_name"); /* use the given root */
+
+        doc->intSubset = dtd;
+        if (doc->children == NULL) xmlAddChild((xmlNodePtr)doc, (xmlNodePtr)dtd);
+        else xmlAddPrevSibling(doc->children, (xmlNodePtr)dtd);
+          </pre>
+  </li>
+  <li>etc ...</li>
+</ol>
+
+<p><a href="mailto:Daniel.Veillard@w3.org">Daniel Veillard</a></p>
+
+<p>$Id$</p>
+</body>
+</html>