Fixed bug #347316, reported by David Belius: The simple type, which was
* xmlschemas.c: Fixed bug #347316, reported by David Belius:
The simple type, which was the content type definition
of a complex type, which in turn was the base type of a
extending complex type, was missed to be set on this
extending complex type in the derivation machinery.
diff --git a/xmlschemas.c b/xmlschemas.c
index ff89e2c..859bdd8 100644
--- a/xmlschemas.c
+++ b/xmlschemas.c
@@ -18287,10 +18287,18 @@
if (type->contentType == XML_SCHEMA_CONTENT_EMPTY) {
/*
* SPEC (3.2.1)
+ * "If the ·effective content· is empty, then the
+ * {content type} of the [...] base ..."
*/
type->contentType = baseType->contentType;
type->subtypes = baseType->subtypes;
/*
+ * Fixes bug #347316:
+ * This is the case when the base type has a simple
+ * type definition as content.
+ */
+ type->contentTypeDef = baseType->contentTypeDef;
+ /*
* NOTE that the effective mixed is ignored here.
*/
} else if (baseType->contentType == XML_SCHEMA_CONTENT_EMPTY) {