reapply: Use the new TB_NOT_REVERSABLE flag instead of special
reapply: reimplement the second half of the or/add optimization. We should now
with no changes. Turns out that one missing "Defs = [EFLAGS]" can upset things
a bit.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@116040 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/lib/Target/X86/X86MCInstLower.cpp b/lib/Target/X86/X86MCInstLower.cpp
index 662717b..8f90d87 100644
--- a/lib/Target/X86/X86MCInstLower.cpp
+++ b/lib/Target/X86/X86MCInstLower.cpp
@@ -437,9 +437,15 @@
// These are pseudo-ops for OR to help with the OR->ADD transformation. We do
// this with an ugly goto in case the resultant OR uses EAX and needs the
// short form.
- case X86::ADD16rr_DB: OutMI.setOpcode(X86::OR16rr); goto ReSimplify;
- case X86::ADD32rr_DB: OutMI.setOpcode(X86::OR32rr); goto ReSimplify;
- case X86::ADD64rr_DB: OutMI.setOpcode(X86::OR64rr); goto ReSimplify;
+ case X86::ADD16rr_DB: OutMI.setOpcode(X86::OR16rr); goto ReSimplify;
+ case X86::ADD32rr_DB: OutMI.setOpcode(X86::OR32rr); goto ReSimplify;
+ case X86::ADD64rr_DB: OutMI.setOpcode(X86::OR64rr); goto ReSimplify;
+ case X86::ADD16ri_DB: OutMI.setOpcode(X86::OR16ri); goto ReSimplify;
+ case X86::ADD32ri_DB: OutMI.setOpcode(X86::OR32ri); goto ReSimplify;
+ case X86::ADD64ri32_DB: OutMI.setOpcode(X86::OR64ri32); goto ReSimplify;
+ case X86::ADD16ri8_DB: OutMI.setOpcode(X86::OR16ri8); goto ReSimplify;
+ case X86::ADD32ri8_DB: OutMI.setOpcode(X86::OR32ri8); goto ReSimplify;
+ case X86::ADD64ri8_DB: OutMI.setOpcode(X86::OR64ri8); goto ReSimplify;
// The assembler backend wants to see branches in their small form and relax
// them to their large form. The JIT can only handle the large form because