Factor address mode matcher out of codegen prepare to make it available to other passes, e.g. loop strength reduction.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@65134 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/lib/Transforms/Utils/AddrModeMatcher.cpp b/lib/Transforms/Utils/AddrModeMatcher.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..766f1ed
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/Transforms/Utils/AddrModeMatcher.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,593 @@
+//===- AddrModeMatcher.cpp - Addressing mode matching facility --*- C++ -*-===//
+//
+// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
+//
+// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
+// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+//
+// This file implements target addressing mode matcher class.
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/AddrModeMatcher.h"
+#include "llvm/DerivedTypes.h"
+#include "llvm/GlobalValue.h"
+#include "llvm/Instruction.h"
+#include "llvm/Assembly/Writer.h"
+#include "llvm/Target/TargetData.h"
+#include "llvm/Support/GetElementPtrTypeIterator.h"
+#include "llvm/Support/PatternMatch.h"
+
+using namespace llvm;
+using namespace llvm::PatternMatch;
+
+void ExtAddrMode::print(OStream &OS) const {
+ bool NeedPlus = false;
+ OS << "[";
+ if (BaseGV) {
+ OS << (NeedPlus ? " + " : "")
+ << "GV:";
+ WriteAsOperand(*OS.stream(), BaseGV, /*PrintType=*/false);
+ NeedPlus = true;
+ }
+
+ if (BaseOffs)
+ OS << (NeedPlus ? " + " : "") << BaseOffs, NeedPlus = true;
+
+ if (BaseReg) {
+ OS << (NeedPlus ? " + " : "")
+ << "Base:";
+ WriteAsOperand(*OS.stream(), BaseReg, /*PrintType=*/false);
+ NeedPlus = true;
+ }
+ if (Scale) {
+ OS << (NeedPlus ? " + " : "")
+ << Scale << "*";
+ WriteAsOperand(*OS.stream(), ScaledReg, /*PrintType=*/false);
+ NeedPlus = true;
+ }
+
+ OS << ']';
+}
+
+void ExtAddrMode::dump() const {
+ print(cerr);
+ cerr << '\n';
+}
+
+
+/// MatchScaledValue - Try adding ScaleReg*Scale to the current addressing mode.
+/// Return true and update AddrMode if this addr mode is legal for the target,
+/// false if not.
+bool AddressingModeMatcher::MatchScaledValue(Value *ScaleReg, int64_t Scale,
+ unsigned Depth) {
+ // If Scale is 1, then this is the same as adding ScaleReg to the addressing
+ // mode. Just process that directly.
+ if (Scale == 1)
+ return MatchAddr(ScaleReg, Depth);
+
+ // If the scale is 0, it takes nothing to add this.
+ if (Scale == 0)
+ return true;
+
+ // If we already have a scale of this value, we can add to it, otherwise, we
+ // need an available scale field.
+ if (AddrMode.Scale != 0 && AddrMode.ScaledReg != ScaleReg)
+ return false;
+
+ ExtAddrMode TestAddrMode = AddrMode;
+
+ // Add scale to turn X*4+X*3 -> X*7. This could also do things like
+ // [A+B + A*7] -> [B+A*8].
+ TestAddrMode.Scale += Scale;
+ TestAddrMode.ScaledReg = ScaleReg;
+
+ // If the new address isn't legal, bail out.
+ if (!TLI.isLegalAddressingMode(TestAddrMode, AccessTy))
+ return false;
+
+ // It was legal, so commit it.
+ AddrMode = TestAddrMode;
+
+ // Okay, we decided that we can add ScaleReg+Scale to AddrMode. Check now
+ // to see if ScaleReg is actually X+C. If so, we can turn this into adding
+ // X*Scale + C*Scale to addr mode.
+ ConstantInt *CI; Value *AddLHS;
+ if (isa<Instruction>(ScaleReg) && // not a constant expr.
+ match(ScaleReg, m_Add(m_Value(AddLHS), m_ConstantInt(CI)))) {
+ TestAddrMode.ScaledReg = AddLHS;
+ TestAddrMode.BaseOffs += CI->getSExtValue()*TestAddrMode.Scale;
+
+ // If this addressing mode is legal, commit it and remember that we folded
+ // this instruction.
+ if (TLI.isLegalAddressingMode(TestAddrMode, AccessTy)) {
+ AddrModeInsts.push_back(cast<Instruction>(ScaleReg));
+ AddrMode = TestAddrMode;
+ return true;
+ }
+ }
+
+ // Otherwise, not (x+c)*scale, just return what we have.
+ return true;
+}
+
+/// MightBeFoldableInst - This is a little filter, which returns true if an
+/// addressing computation involving I might be folded into a load/store
+/// accessing it. This doesn't need to be perfect, but needs to accept at least
+/// the set of instructions that MatchOperationAddr can.
+static bool MightBeFoldableInst(Instruction *I) {
+ switch (I->getOpcode()) {
+ case Instruction::BitCast:
+ // Don't touch identity bitcasts.
+ if (I->getType() == I->getOperand(0)->getType())
+ return false;
+ return isa<PointerType>(I->getType()) || isa<IntegerType>(I->getType());
+ case Instruction::PtrToInt:
+ // PtrToInt is always a noop, as we know that the int type is pointer sized.
+ return true;
+ case Instruction::IntToPtr:
+ // We know the input is intptr_t, so this is foldable.
+ return true;
+ case Instruction::Add:
+ return true;
+ case Instruction::Mul:
+ case Instruction::Shl:
+ // Can only handle X*C and X << C.
+ return isa<ConstantInt>(I->getOperand(1));
+ case Instruction::GetElementPtr:
+ return true;
+ default:
+ return false;
+ }
+}
+
+
+/// MatchOperationAddr - Given an instruction or constant expr, see if we can
+/// fold the operation into the addressing mode. If so, update the addressing
+/// mode and return true, otherwise return false without modifying AddrMode.
+bool AddressingModeMatcher::MatchOperationAddr(User *AddrInst, unsigned Opcode,
+ unsigned Depth) {
+ // Avoid exponential behavior on extremely deep expression trees.
+ if (Depth >= 5) return false;
+
+ switch (Opcode) {
+ case Instruction::PtrToInt:
+ // PtrToInt is always a noop, as we know that the int type is pointer sized.
+ return MatchAddr(AddrInst->getOperand(0), Depth);
+ case Instruction::IntToPtr:
+ // This inttoptr is a no-op if the integer type is pointer sized.
+ if (TLI.getValueType(AddrInst->getOperand(0)->getType()) ==
+ TLI.getPointerTy())
+ return MatchAddr(AddrInst->getOperand(0), Depth);
+ return false;
+ case Instruction::BitCast:
+ // BitCast is always a noop, and we can handle it as long as it is
+ // int->int or pointer->pointer (we don't want int<->fp or something).
+ if ((isa<PointerType>(AddrInst->getOperand(0)->getType()) ||
+ isa<IntegerType>(AddrInst->getOperand(0)->getType())) &&
+ // Don't touch identity bitcasts. These were probably put here by LSR,
+ // and we don't want to mess around with them. Assume it knows what it
+ // is doing.
+ AddrInst->getOperand(0)->getType() != AddrInst->getType())
+ return MatchAddr(AddrInst->getOperand(0), Depth);
+ return false;
+ case Instruction::Add: {
+ // Check to see if we can merge in the RHS then the LHS. If so, we win.
+ ExtAddrMode BackupAddrMode = AddrMode;
+ unsigned OldSize = AddrModeInsts.size();
+ if (MatchAddr(AddrInst->getOperand(1), Depth+1) &&
+ MatchAddr(AddrInst->getOperand(0), Depth+1))
+ return true;
+
+ // Restore the old addr mode info.
+ AddrMode = BackupAddrMode;
+ AddrModeInsts.resize(OldSize);
+
+ // Otherwise this was over-aggressive. Try merging in the LHS then the RHS.
+ if (MatchAddr(AddrInst->getOperand(0), Depth+1) &&
+ MatchAddr(AddrInst->getOperand(1), Depth+1))
+ return true;
+
+ // Otherwise we definitely can't merge the ADD in.
+ AddrMode = BackupAddrMode;
+ AddrModeInsts.resize(OldSize);
+ break;
+ }
+ //case Instruction::Or:
+ // TODO: We can handle "Or Val, Imm" iff this OR is equivalent to an ADD.
+ //break;
+ case Instruction::Mul:
+ case Instruction::Shl: {
+ // Can only handle X*C and X << C.
+ ConstantInt *RHS = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(AddrInst->getOperand(1));
+ if (!RHS) return false;
+ int64_t Scale = RHS->getSExtValue();
+ if (Opcode == Instruction::Shl)
+ Scale = 1 << Scale;
+
+ return MatchScaledValue(AddrInst->getOperand(0), Scale, Depth);
+ }
+ case Instruction::GetElementPtr: {
+ // Scan the GEP. We check it if it contains constant offsets and at most
+ // one variable offset.
+ int VariableOperand = -1;
+ unsigned VariableScale = 0;
+
+ int64_t ConstantOffset = 0;
+ const TargetData *TD = TLI.getTargetData();
+ gep_type_iterator GTI = gep_type_begin(AddrInst);
+ for (unsigned i = 1, e = AddrInst->getNumOperands(); i != e; ++i, ++GTI) {
+ if (const StructType *STy = dyn_cast<StructType>(*GTI)) {
+ const StructLayout *SL = TD->getStructLayout(STy);
+ unsigned Idx =
+ cast<ConstantInt>(AddrInst->getOperand(i))->getZExtValue();
+ ConstantOffset += SL->getElementOffset(Idx);
+ } else {
+ uint64_t TypeSize = TD->getTypePaddedSize(GTI.getIndexedType());
+ if (ConstantInt *CI = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(AddrInst->getOperand(i))) {
+ ConstantOffset += CI->getSExtValue()*TypeSize;
+ } else if (TypeSize) { // Scales of zero don't do anything.
+ // We only allow one variable index at the moment.
+ if (VariableOperand != -1)
+ return false;
+
+ // Remember the variable index.
+ VariableOperand = i;
+ VariableScale = TypeSize;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ // A common case is for the GEP to only do a constant offset. In this case,
+ // just add it to the disp field and check validity.
+ if (VariableOperand == -1) {
+ AddrMode.BaseOffs += ConstantOffset;
+ if (ConstantOffset == 0 || TLI.isLegalAddressingMode(AddrMode, AccessTy)){
+ // Check to see if we can fold the base pointer in too.
+ if (MatchAddr(AddrInst->getOperand(0), Depth+1))
+ return true;
+ }
+ AddrMode.BaseOffs -= ConstantOffset;
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ // Save the valid addressing mode in case we can't match.
+ ExtAddrMode BackupAddrMode = AddrMode;
+
+ // Check that this has no base reg yet. If so, we won't have a place to
+ // put the base of the GEP (assuming it is not a null ptr).
+ bool SetBaseReg = true;
+ if (isa<ConstantPointerNull>(AddrInst->getOperand(0)))
+ SetBaseReg = false; // null pointer base doesn't need representation.
+ else if (AddrMode.HasBaseReg)
+ return false; // Base register already specified, can't match GEP.
+ else {
+ // Otherwise, we'll use the GEP base as the BaseReg.
+ AddrMode.HasBaseReg = true;
+ AddrMode.BaseReg = AddrInst->getOperand(0);
+ }
+
+ // See if the scale and offset amount is valid for this target.
+ AddrMode.BaseOffs += ConstantOffset;
+
+ if (!MatchScaledValue(AddrInst->getOperand(VariableOperand), VariableScale,
+ Depth)) {
+ AddrMode = BackupAddrMode;
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ // If we have a null as the base of the GEP, folding in the constant offset
+ // plus variable scale is all we can do.
+ if (!SetBaseReg) return true;
+
+ // If this match succeeded, we know that we can form an address with the
+ // GepBase as the basereg. Match the base pointer of the GEP more
+ // aggressively by zeroing out BaseReg and rematching. If the base is
+ // (for example) another GEP, this allows merging in that other GEP into
+ // the addressing mode we're forming.
+ AddrMode.HasBaseReg = false;
+ AddrMode.BaseReg = 0;
+ bool Success = MatchAddr(AddrInst->getOperand(0), Depth+1);
+ assert(Success && "MatchAddr should be able to fill in BaseReg!");
+ Success=Success;
+ return true;
+ }
+ }
+ return false;
+}
+
+/// MatchAddr - If we can, try to add the value of 'Addr' into the current
+/// addressing mode. If Addr can't be added to AddrMode this returns false and
+/// leaves AddrMode unmodified. This assumes that Addr is either a pointer type
+/// or intptr_t for the target.
+///
+bool AddressingModeMatcher::MatchAddr(Value *Addr, unsigned Depth) {
+ if (ConstantInt *CI = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(Addr)) {
+ // Fold in immediates if legal for the target.
+ AddrMode.BaseOffs += CI->getSExtValue();
+ if (TLI.isLegalAddressingMode(AddrMode, AccessTy))
+ return true;
+ AddrMode.BaseOffs -= CI->getSExtValue();
+ } else if (GlobalValue *GV = dyn_cast<GlobalValue>(Addr)) {
+ // If this is a global variable, try to fold it into the addressing mode.
+ if (AddrMode.BaseGV == 0) {
+ AddrMode.BaseGV = GV;
+ if (TLI.isLegalAddressingMode(AddrMode, AccessTy))
+ return true;
+ AddrMode.BaseGV = 0;
+ }
+ } else if (Instruction *I = dyn_cast<Instruction>(Addr)) {
+ ExtAddrMode BackupAddrMode = AddrMode;
+ unsigned OldSize = AddrModeInsts.size();
+
+ // Check to see if it is possible to fold this operation.
+ if (MatchOperationAddr(I, I->getOpcode(), Depth)) {
+ // Okay, it's possible to fold this. Check to see if it is actually
+ // *profitable* to do so. We use a simple cost model to avoid increasing
+ // register pressure too much.
+ if (I->hasOneUse() ||
+ IsProfitableToFoldIntoAddressingMode(I, BackupAddrMode, AddrMode)) {
+ AddrModeInsts.push_back(I);
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ // It isn't profitable to do this, roll back.
+ //cerr << "NOT FOLDING: " << *I;
+ AddrMode = BackupAddrMode;
+ AddrModeInsts.resize(OldSize);
+ }
+ } else if (ConstantExpr *CE = dyn_cast<ConstantExpr>(Addr)) {
+ if (MatchOperationAddr(CE, CE->getOpcode(), Depth))
+ return true;
+ } else if (isa<ConstantPointerNull>(Addr)) {
+ // Null pointer gets folded without affecting the addressing mode.
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ // Worse case, the target should support [reg] addressing modes. :)
+ if (!AddrMode.HasBaseReg) {
+ AddrMode.HasBaseReg = true;
+ AddrMode.BaseReg = Addr;
+ // Still check for legality in case the target supports [imm] but not [i+r].
+ if (TLI.isLegalAddressingMode(AddrMode, AccessTy))
+ return true;
+ AddrMode.HasBaseReg = false;
+ AddrMode.BaseReg = 0;
+ }
+
+ // If the base register is already taken, see if we can do [r+r].
+ if (AddrMode.Scale == 0) {
+ AddrMode.Scale = 1;
+ AddrMode.ScaledReg = Addr;
+ if (TLI.isLegalAddressingMode(AddrMode, AccessTy))
+ return true;
+ AddrMode.Scale = 0;
+ AddrMode.ScaledReg = 0;
+ }
+ // Couldn't match.
+ return false;
+}
+
+
+/// IsOperandAMemoryOperand - Check to see if all uses of OpVal by the specified
+/// inline asm call are due to memory operands. If so, return true, otherwise
+/// return false.
+static bool IsOperandAMemoryOperand(CallInst *CI, InlineAsm *IA, Value *OpVal,
+ const TargetLowering &TLI) {
+ std::vector<InlineAsm::ConstraintInfo>
+ Constraints = IA->ParseConstraints();
+
+ unsigned ArgNo = 1; // ArgNo - The operand of the CallInst.
+ for (unsigned i = 0, e = Constraints.size(); i != e; ++i) {
+ TargetLowering::AsmOperandInfo OpInfo(Constraints[i]);
+
+ // Compute the value type for each operand.
+ switch (OpInfo.Type) {
+ case InlineAsm::isOutput:
+ if (OpInfo.isIndirect)
+ OpInfo.CallOperandVal = CI->getOperand(ArgNo++);
+ break;
+ case InlineAsm::isInput:
+ OpInfo.CallOperandVal = CI->getOperand(ArgNo++);
+ break;
+ case InlineAsm::isClobber:
+ // Nothing to do.
+ break;
+ }
+
+ // Compute the constraint code and ConstraintType to use.
+ TLI.ComputeConstraintToUse(OpInfo, SDValue(),
+ OpInfo.ConstraintType == TargetLowering::C_Memory);
+
+ // If this asm operand is our Value*, and if it isn't an indirect memory
+ // operand, we can't fold it!
+ if (OpInfo.CallOperandVal == OpVal &&
+ (OpInfo.ConstraintType != TargetLowering::C_Memory ||
+ !OpInfo.isIndirect))
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ return true;
+}
+
+
+/// FindAllMemoryUses - Recursively walk all the uses of I until we find a
+/// memory use. If we find an obviously non-foldable instruction, return true.
+/// Add the ultimately found memory instructions to MemoryUses.
+static bool FindAllMemoryUses(Instruction *I,
+ SmallVectorImpl<std::pair<Instruction*,unsigned> > &MemoryUses,
+ SmallPtrSet<Instruction*, 16> &ConsideredInsts,
+ const TargetLowering &TLI) {
+ // If we already considered this instruction, we're done.
+ if (!ConsideredInsts.insert(I))
+ return false;
+
+ // If this is an obviously unfoldable instruction, bail out.
+ if (!MightBeFoldableInst(I))
+ return true;
+
+ // Loop over all the uses, recursively processing them.
+ for (Value::use_iterator UI = I->use_begin(), E = I->use_end();
+ UI != E; ++UI) {
+ if (LoadInst *LI = dyn_cast<LoadInst>(*UI)) {
+ MemoryUses.push_back(std::make_pair(LI, UI.getOperandNo()));
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ if (StoreInst *SI = dyn_cast<StoreInst>(*UI)) {
+ if (UI.getOperandNo() == 0) return true; // Storing addr, not into addr.
+ MemoryUses.push_back(std::make_pair(SI, UI.getOperandNo()));
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ if (CallInst *CI = dyn_cast<CallInst>(*UI)) {
+ InlineAsm *IA = dyn_cast<InlineAsm>(CI->getCalledValue());
+ if (IA == 0) return true;
+
+ // If this is a memory operand, we're cool, otherwise bail out.
+ if (!IsOperandAMemoryOperand(CI, IA, I, TLI))
+ return true;
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ if (FindAllMemoryUses(cast<Instruction>(*UI), MemoryUses, ConsideredInsts,
+ TLI))
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ return false;
+}
+
+
+/// ValueAlreadyLiveAtInst - Retrn true if Val is already known to be live at
+/// the use site that we're folding it into. If so, there is no cost to
+/// include it in the addressing mode. KnownLive1 and KnownLive2 are two values
+/// that we know are live at the instruction already.
+bool AddressingModeMatcher::ValueAlreadyLiveAtInst(Value *Val,Value *KnownLive1,
+ Value *KnownLive2) {
+ // If Val is either of the known-live values, we know it is live!
+ if (Val == 0 || Val == KnownLive1 || Val == KnownLive2)
+ return true;
+
+ // All values other than instructions and arguments (e.g. constants) are live.
+ if (!isa<Instruction>(Val) && !isa<Argument>(Val)) return true;
+
+ // If Val is a constant sized alloca in the entry block, it is live, this is
+ // true because it is just a reference to the stack/frame pointer, which is
+ // live for the whole function.
+ if (AllocaInst *AI = dyn_cast<AllocaInst>(Val))
+ if (AI->isStaticAlloca())
+ return true;
+
+ // Check to see if this value is already used in the memory instruction's
+ // block. If so, it's already live into the block at the very least, so we
+ // can reasonably fold it.
+ BasicBlock *MemBB = MemoryInst->getParent();
+ for (Value::use_iterator UI = Val->use_begin(), E = Val->use_end();
+ UI != E; ++UI)
+ // We know that uses of arguments and instructions have to be instructions.
+ if (cast<Instruction>(*UI)->getParent() == MemBB)
+ return true;
+
+ return false;
+}
+
+
+
+/// IsProfitableToFoldIntoAddressingMode - It is possible for the addressing
+/// mode of the machine to fold the specified instruction into a load or store
+/// that ultimately uses it. However, the specified instruction has multiple
+/// uses. Given this, it may actually increase register pressure to fold it
+/// into the load. For example, consider this code:
+///
+/// X = ...
+/// Y = X+1
+/// use(Y) -> nonload/store
+/// Z = Y+1
+/// load Z
+///
+/// In this case, Y has multiple uses, and can be folded into the load of Z
+/// (yielding load [X+2]). However, doing this will cause both "X" and "X+1" to
+/// be live at the use(Y) line. If we don't fold Y into load Z, we use one
+/// fewer register. Since Y can't be folded into "use(Y)" we don't increase the
+/// number of computations either.
+///
+/// Note that this (like most of CodeGenPrepare) is just a rough heuristic. If
+/// X was live across 'load Z' for other reasons, we actually *would* want to
+/// fold the addressing mode in the Z case. This would make Y die earlier.
+bool AddressingModeMatcher::
+IsProfitableToFoldIntoAddressingMode(Instruction *I, ExtAddrMode &AMBefore,
+ ExtAddrMode &AMAfter) {
+ if (IgnoreProfitability) return true;
+
+ // AMBefore is the addressing mode before this instruction was folded into it,
+ // and AMAfter is the addressing mode after the instruction was folded. Get
+ // the set of registers referenced by AMAfter and subtract out those
+ // referenced by AMBefore: this is the set of values which folding in this
+ // address extends the lifetime of.
+ //
+ // Note that there are only two potential values being referenced here,
+ // BaseReg and ScaleReg (global addresses are always available, as are any
+ // folded immediates).
+ Value *BaseReg = AMAfter.BaseReg, *ScaledReg = AMAfter.ScaledReg;
+
+ // If the BaseReg or ScaledReg was referenced by the previous addrmode, their
+ // lifetime wasn't extended by adding this instruction.
+ if (ValueAlreadyLiveAtInst(BaseReg, AMBefore.BaseReg, AMBefore.ScaledReg))
+ BaseReg = 0;
+ if (ValueAlreadyLiveAtInst(ScaledReg, AMBefore.BaseReg, AMBefore.ScaledReg))
+ ScaledReg = 0;
+
+ // If folding this instruction (and it's subexprs) didn't extend any live
+ // ranges, we're ok with it.
+ if (BaseReg == 0 && ScaledReg == 0)
+ return true;
+
+ // If all uses of this instruction are ultimately load/store/inlineasm's,
+ // check to see if their addressing modes will include this instruction. If
+ // so, we can fold it into all uses, so it doesn't matter if it has multiple
+ // uses.
+ SmallVector<std::pair<Instruction*,unsigned>, 16> MemoryUses;
+ SmallPtrSet<Instruction*, 16> ConsideredInsts;
+ if (FindAllMemoryUses(I, MemoryUses, ConsideredInsts, TLI))
+ return false; // Has a non-memory, non-foldable use!
+
+ // Now that we know that all uses of this instruction are part of a chain of
+ // computation involving only operations that could theoretically be folded
+ // into a memory use, loop over each of these uses and see if they could
+ // *actually* fold the instruction.
+ SmallVector<Instruction*, 32> MatchedAddrModeInsts;
+ for (unsigned i = 0, e = MemoryUses.size(); i != e; ++i) {
+ Instruction *User = MemoryUses[i].first;
+ unsigned OpNo = MemoryUses[i].second;
+
+ // Get the access type of this use. If the use isn't a pointer, we don't
+ // know what it accesses.
+ Value *Address = User->getOperand(OpNo);
+ if (!isa<PointerType>(Address->getType()))
+ return false;
+ const Type *AddressAccessTy =
+ cast<PointerType>(Address->getType())->getElementType();
+
+ // Do a match against the root of this address, ignoring profitability. This
+ // will tell us if the addressing mode for the memory operation will
+ // *actually* cover the shared instruction.
+ ExtAddrMode Result;
+ AddressingModeMatcher Matcher(MatchedAddrModeInsts, TLI, AddressAccessTy,
+ MemoryInst, Result);
+ Matcher.IgnoreProfitability = true;
+ bool Success = Matcher.MatchAddr(Address, 0);
+ Success = Success; assert(Success && "Couldn't select *anything*?");
+
+ // If the match didn't cover I, then it won't be shared by it.
+ if (std::find(MatchedAddrModeInsts.begin(), MatchedAddrModeInsts.end(),
+ I) == MatchedAddrModeInsts.end())
+ return false;
+
+ MatchedAddrModeInsts.clear();
+ }
+
+ return true;
+}