The hasMemory argument is irrelevant to how the argument
for an "i" constraint should get lowered; PR 6309.  While
this argument was passed around a lot, this is the only
place it was used, so it goes away from a lot of other
places.



git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@106893 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/lib/Transforms/Scalar/CodeGenPrepare.cpp b/lib/Transforms/Scalar/CodeGenPrepare.cpp
index cf239b7..f645a5a 100644
--- a/lib/Transforms/Scalar/CodeGenPrepare.cpp
+++ b/lib/Transforms/Scalar/CodeGenPrepare.cpp
@@ -759,8 +759,7 @@
     }
 
     // Compute the constraint code and ConstraintType to use.
-    TLI->ComputeConstraintToUse(OpInfo, SDValue(),
-                             OpInfo.ConstraintType == TargetLowering::C_Memory);
+    TLI->ComputeConstraintToUse(OpInfo, SDValue());
 
     if (OpInfo.ConstraintType == TargetLowering::C_Memory &&
         OpInfo.isIndirect) {